I just came here for to make a simple point, a Muslim is one who prays regularly and One who Obeys Allah and His Messenger.

If those who have No True Knowledge of Islaam and judge Muslims and Islaam as a faith based on what the Bias Media feeds you then you are truly mislead.

Many of the population are being mislead, mis-educated and most certainly mis-informed. Each and evey one of you have a responsibility to educate your self and make judgement based upon your own investigation. Most people who speak on National platform reaching to Millions only speak out of ignorance.

Hate if you wish or be smart and seek the truth, No one can claim they are a Goddly person if their actions are not honourable and claim they are so and so if they don’t follow the principles.

God is the judge of all judges and all will be accounatble for their actions and intentions.

From a Muslim in East London

So how is that approach working out for you? Fiddling while Rome burns comes to mind. Not one of the three mainstream parties mentioned the Dispatches programme on their sites today. Needless to say the BNP did. The mainstream mob are deeply embarrassed about Islamism and sincerely wish it would go away and their strategy is, in general, to say nothing about it in the vain hope that it will. To acknowledge the depth of the problem would start casting doubt on the “all peoples and cultures are equal” myth which the so-called “real” or Marxist Socialists have perpetuated. No they are not; not all people and cultures are equal; some are more equal than others. It is not in the national interest of this country to have certain people and cultures in it. The Swiss, with their truly enviable model of direct democracy, understand this. The SPP are the single largest party in their parliament and the success of the recent minaret ban referendum indicates the support of the Swiss people for real action on Islamic Colonisation. Is anybody here in any doubt of a similar result were such a referendum be held here? It is unfortunate that only the knuckledraggers of the BNP (who are as homophobic as the Islamists) are truly reflecting public opinion in this matter and that we do not have nationalist politicians of the calibre of Geert Wilders over here to reflect the views of the majority.

http://tinyurl.com/yh4dtln

One of the unceasingly amusing, though often irritating, thing about Islamists is the jaw-dropping amount of self-pity they have. The average Jihadist is just Victor Meldrew in a fucking suicide vest.

It’s late and I am really tired but I think maybe people are seriously confused about this so maybe this deserves a separate post with its own discussion thread, which I don’t have the energy to do tonight.

Briefly though a huge difference between “national socialism” and Marxist or “real” socialism, as well as the liberal adaptations we see today, is the fact that true socialism is based on ideals about the equality of people. Fascism, especially the Nazis, doesn’t believe this AT ALL and I shouldn’t have to remind people of this.

It’s true that a model like Stalin’s Soviet Union was also totalitarian but socialism per se isn’t anti-democratic. Fascism however, is, because power is vested at the top, not in the worker.

The Nazis, need I remind y’all, specifically believed in the superiority of Certain People and went out and exterminated others.

Also, it is erroneous to assume that the Nazi state owned all the wealth.

That is untrue. Nazi Germany was aggressively capitalistic. Within the framework of the Nazi state there were not only powerful corporate leaders but the remnants of the old aristocracy – there most certainly was a class system, which is per se antithetical to socialist ideals.

The Nazi state was actually run by corporate power within the framework of a state ideal based on visions of a master race and world domination, so the hyperpowerful army was part of the ideal of state, part of the fascist ideal is raw power.

In fact fascism, let alone “National Socialism”, ie the Nazis, are very far from ideals like “the workers should own the means of production”, ie the little people will be empowered and not be dominated by corporate bosses or feudal landlords, depending, and that “to each according to his needs, from each according to what he has to offer,” in other words, all people will receive baseline health, education, welfare so that nobody starves and people will in turn contribute their talents.

Beyond that true socialism is assertively anti-racist.

That is nothing at all like the Nazi model, which also glorified “the man on horseback,” Franco, Hitler, Mussolini, rather than the trade unionist, the artist, the farmer, and dignified labor rather than raw power and military might.

It’s disingenous as well as offensive that people can so utterly twist reality like this. In fact it reminds me of the word games and falsifications of history we see lately in “post-modern” “history”.

There was nothing “left wing” about fascism, period. And there’s no excuse for justifying outfits like the BNP regardless of how frightened one might be of radical Islamists or whatever other threat we might encounter, or pretending “National Socialism” is anything like the socialism we see today in modern Europe or Canada or even aspects of the American economy, and thus making excuses for the BNP and other far right wing European political parties, or the neonazis in the US for that matter.

The way to work against bigoted, racist, violent ideologies isn’t to counter them with other bigoted, racist violent ideologies but rather to support the ideals we do believe in, and try to embody them.