Comments on: Gita Sahgal: Naysayers

By: flash

flash — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:58:33 +0000

what are we gonna have now… a fatwa against geeta? geeta goes hiding under protection? hats off to her for standing tall agianst AI and exposing the dirty work of the terrorist supporters like baig, who try to legitimise their idelogies in the western world..

By: TC

TC — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:34 +0000

Anyone see the BBC’s Today Radio prog this morning? AI completely destroyed Gita’s argument.

By: andrew adams

andrew adams — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:33:42 +0000

Mettaculture, if you really find my remarks more shocking then all of the others you have seen here you must have a very odd perspective on things.
I’m not going to bother to reply to most of your rant but I will address one point – that I smear my opponents as neo-cons and Zionists. I do certainly think that there are people with what I will call (probably innacurately but it’ll do for now) neocon tendencies who want to undermine AI and other NGO’s who are critical of Western abuses of human rights. There are others, some of whom post here, who are on the fringe of the more bonkers pro-Israel faction who have the same agenda. I didn’t and I’m not going to label them as Zionists because I wouldn’t say they are representative of Zionists as a whole (they aren’t even neccessarily Jewish).

By: andrew adams

andrew adams — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:18:59 +0000

I addressed this to Andrew Adams. Are you Andrew Adams?

But it wasn’t me who made the remark you were replying to. It was Dave.

By: Dave Weeden

Dave Weeden — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:47:46 +0000

Brownie, maybe you did address your remark to Andrew Adams, but you quoted me, so I replied. Hence the confusion. For the record, however, I’m not Andrew Adams.

By: Zkharya

Zkharya — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:46:42 +0000

Yes, impressive rant, Meta.

By: Brownie

Brownie — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:25:07 +0000

“It’s a little bit pathetic and I expected better from you.” It’s very kind of you, Brownie, but if you keep your hopes realistic, you won’t get disappointed.

I addressed this to Andrew Adams. Are you Andrew Adams? I know you’ve all adopted hilarious online personnae at AW and, it seems now, elsewhere, so it’s difficult to keep up. It’s all a terrific wheeze flitting from blog to blog calling yourself something different each time, I know, but it makes it difficult to puruse meaningful discussion.

You know, you could have come over to Aaro Watch, and taken up with me there.

1 – What do you call yourself over there?
2 – Who the fuck do you think ‘Anonymous’ is on that AW thread? I don’t have a Google a/c or I’d have gladly logged in.

By: virgil xenophon

virgil xenophon — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:15:24 +0000

“At least you didn’t call me a Nazi.”

Boy THAT’s a rare occurrence these days–I don’t care which site one visits–especially for you, AOS. Seems a few people have been out gunning for you recently (metaphorically speaking, that is.) LOL!

By: Anaximanders other sandal

Anaximanders other sandal — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:33:04 +0000

“As for AOS and his “ALL leftists” rant, just ignore him. He’s simply an ideologically driven fool who loves the sound of his own voice and believes that once he says something, it’s god’s truth.”

I, unlike you, don’t believe in fantasy “gods”.

At least you didn’t call me a nazi.

Anyway you and the rest of the gang are big boys and girls aren’t you, surely my ‘rants’ don’t bother you that much do they, after all they are only ‘rants’ after all, aren’t they.

By: virgil xenophon

virgil xenophon — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:33:13 +0000

Oh, hello Metta. I was busily typing away and didn’t notice your second post as I was away for awhile before I hit the send key. I was, of course, referring to your original post, but quite appreciate the latest, above, as well.

Cheers!