<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Islam Channel Pushes Awlaki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek Pasquill</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-434254</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Pasquill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-434254</guid>
		<description>The Great Question Time Debacle. Moore makes some adverse comments about MCB while on QT. MCB litigate. BBC pays out £30 or £40 K to MCB.

A tragedy in three acts.

Obviously a little more complex but this is the nub of it.

Oh, and I don&#039;t pay my licence fee either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Great Question Time Debacle. Moore makes some adverse comments about MCB while on QT. MCB litigate. BBC pays out £30 or £40 K to MCB.</p>
<p>A tragedy in three acts.</p>
<p>Obviously a little more complex but this is the nub of it.</p>
<p>Oh, and I don&#8217;t pay my licence fee either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Scholar</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-434226</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Scholar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-434226</guid>
		<description>Explain this &quot;question time debacle&quot;, I missed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explain this &#8220;question time debacle&#8221;, I missed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Pasquill</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-434208</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Pasquill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-434208</guid>
		<description>Alcuin - don&#039;t forget that the BBC has been effectively hobbled by lawfare, ie any suggestion that the Muslim Council of Britain is not an organisation devoted exclusively to sweetness and light, will not get airplay after it paid out after the Question Time debacle.

Amusing to note that Charles Moore continues not to pay his television licence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alcuin &#8211; don&#8217;t forget that the BBC has been effectively hobbled by lawfare, ie any suggestion that the Muslim Council of Britain is not an organisation devoted exclusively to sweetness and light, will not get airplay after it paid out after the Question Time debacle.</p>
<p>Amusing to note that Charles Moore continues not to pay his television licence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Scholar</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-434123</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Scholar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-434123</guid>
		<description>Hey I had a thought.

All you people who claim that Islam is not Islamism.

Find an Islamic television channel that isn&#039;t Islamist.

Good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I had a thought.</p>
<p>All you people who claim that Islam is not Islamism.</p>
<p>Find an Islamic television channel that isn&#8217;t Islamist.</p>
<p>Good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anaximanders other sandal</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-434064</link>
		<dc:creator>Anaximanders other sandal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-434064</guid>
		<description>Alcuin comment, from the first to the last word, is correct in every detail.

What&#039;s more I think you lefties know it, in your heart of hearts, I think you know it&#039;s true.

You Lefties can&#039;t fight these Islamonazis by yourselves you know, like it or not you need us conservatives or rather if you want to defeat the threat of Islamonazism you are going to need more than just wishful thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alcuin comment, from the first to the last word, is correct in every detail.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more I think you lefties know it, in your heart of hearts, I think you know it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>You Lefties can&#8217;t fight these Islamonazis by yourselves you know, like it or not you need us conservatives or rather if you want to defeat the threat of Islamonazism you are going to need more than just wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alcuin</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-433997</link>
		<dc:creator>Alcuin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-433997</guid>
		<description>Will a Muslim organisation that is &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; in favour of dawa, jihad and sharia please stand up? Don&#039;t all speak at once. Bungle is a regular presenter on the Islam Channel, is he not?

I would have thought that Boris were a bit more strong on British values, but it looks like he is just another politician, worried about votes and trying to be &quot;nice&quot; to everyone. But he is actually fooling neither of the two cultures in this debate, just buying time.

The organisation that should be standing up for British values is the BBC, after all, they don&#039;t have voters and seem pretty contemptuous of criticism. Unfortunately they have been infiltrated by multiculturalists blinded to threats by affluence and complacency, and the fatuous idea that being white, conservative and Christian is &quot;hideous&quot;.

So they keep getting liberals on to discuss these issues (what idiot let that f***ing James woman on?), and to the BBC, Bungle and Ramadan are &quot;liberals&quot;. When they want to spice things up a bit, they get Choudrary or Tamami on to &quot;rock the boat&quot; and create &quot;good television&quot; - i.e. &quot;edgy&quot; stuff. Edgy is good to media types, particularly if it involves gay sex, toilet humour or anything else likely to get Mary Whitehouse to roll in her grave.

But people like Wilders, Bostom, Warraq, Wafa Sultan, Nonie Darwish and Hirsi Ali are &quot;edgy&quot;, aren&#039;t they? Why don&#039;t we ever see such people on the BBC? To be fair, Wilders was on Hardtalk once, but got a grilling from Sackur that the monster Omar Al-Bashir did not get from Zeinab Badawi. This is where political correctness (aka cultural cringe) cuts in.

It seems only criticism of conservative values is &quot;edgy&quot;. Aren&#039;t Muslim clerics &quot;conservative&quot;, though? No, the BBC&#039;s &quot;despised tribes&quot; only run to &lt;i&gt;Northern Irish Unionists, Christian fundamentalists, conservative Roman Catholics, UKIP, most Americans and anything that could be described in the sloppy terminology of &quot;progressives&quot; as &quot;right wing&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

The doublethink is palpable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will a Muslim organisation that is <b>not</b> in favour of dawa, jihad and sharia please stand up? Don&#8217;t all speak at once. Bungle is a regular presenter on the Islam Channel, is he not?</p>
<p>I would have thought that Boris were a bit more strong on British values, but it looks like he is just another politician, worried about votes and trying to be &#8220;nice&#8221; to everyone. But he is actually fooling neither of the two cultures in this debate, just buying time.</p>
<p>The organisation that should be standing up for British values is the BBC, after all, they don&#8217;t have voters and seem pretty contemptuous of criticism. Unfortunately they have been infiltrated by multiculturalists blinded to threats by affluence and complacency, and the fatuous idea that being white, conservative and Christian is &#8220;hideous&#8221;.</p>
<p>So they keep getting liberals on to discuss these issues (what idiot let that f***ing James woman on?), and to the BBC, Bungle and Ramadan are &#8220;liberals&#8221;. When they want to spice things up a bit, they get Choudrary or Tamami on to &#8220;rock the boat&#8221; and create &#8220;good television&#8221; &#8211; i.e. &#8220;edgy&#8221; stuff. Edgy is good to media types, particularly if it involves gay sex, toilet humour or anything else likely to get Mary Whitehouse to roll in her grave.</p>
<p>But people like Wilders, Bostom, Warraq, Wafa Sultan, Nonie Darwish and Hirsi Ali are &#8220;edgy&#8221;, aren&#8217;t they? Why don&#8217;t we ever see such people on the BBC? To be fair, Wilders was on Hardtalk once, but got a grilling from Sackur that the monster Omar Al-Bashir did not get from Zeinab Badawi. This is where political correctness (aka cultural cringe) cuts in.</p>
<p>It seems only criticism of conservative values is &#8220;edgy&#8221;. Aren&#8217;t Muslim clerics &#8220;conservative&#8221;, though? No, the BBC&#8217;s &#8220;despised tribes&#8221; only run to <i>Northern Irish Unionists, Christian fundamentalists, conservative Roman Catholics, UKIP, most Americans and anything that could be described in the sloppy terminology of &#8220;progressives&#8221; as &#8220;right wing&#8221;</i></p>
<p>The doublethink is palpable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Django</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-433949</link>
		<dc:creator>Django</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-433949</guid>
		<description>Well Stan, we would have an idea of that if we could see a record of how many moderate Muslims complained to the Islam Channel about these repulsive adverts. How many do you think did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Stan, we would have an idea of that if we could see a record of how many moderate Muslims complained to the Islam Channel about these repulsive adverts. How many do you think did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-433940</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-433940</guid>
		<description>So, my question (and it is not a rhetorical one) is &quot;do the organizations that are written about in HP, like Islam channel represent mainstream thinking of Muslims in Britain?&quot;.

Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, my question (and it is not a rhetorical one) is &#8220;do the organizations that are written about in HP, like Islam channel represent mainstream thinking of Muslims in Britain?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truthtriumphs</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-433911</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthtriumphs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-433911</guid>
		<description>Tokyo Nambu.

Exactly right--- in a nutshell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tokyo Nambu.</p>
<p>Exactly right&#8212; in a nutshell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2010/01/10/the-islam-channel-pushes-awlaki/comment-page-1/#comment-433873</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=26224#comment-433873</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The US government should step up the pressure on Britain to stop promoting Islamists in the public square.&lt;/i&gt;

What, like how the US Government responded to British requests to stop allowing the promotion of the IRA through its funding vehicle Noraid?  Ha, the shoe&#039;s on the other foot now, isn&#039;t it?

In any event, the British government shouldn&#039;t need US (or any other) pressure to reign in these Islamists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The US government should step up the pressure on Britain to stop promoting Islamists in the public square.</i></p>
<p>What, like how the US Government responded to British requests to stop allowing the promotion of the IRA through its funding vehicle Noraid?  Ha, the shoe&#8217;s on the other foot now, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>In any event, the British government shouldn&#8217;t need US (or any other) pressure to reign in these Islamists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

