<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Boycott Israel&#8221; letter includes unauthorized signature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428868</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428868</guid>
		<description>With all due respect to Labor for Palestine, what have they posted that connects the last (signature) page with the first two petition pages?  In addition to the mysterious blackouts, it&#039;s clear that the last page of their fax/PDF (as opposed to the other two pages) is a blow up of just one section of a larger page.  

Given the recent record of hoaxes and frauds associated with BDS (see http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1259243065278&amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull), forgive me for not taking &quot;Labor for Palestine&quot; at their word when they claim to know someone&#039;s political views better than the person in whose name they are claiming to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect to Labor for Palestine, what have they posted that connects the last (signature) page with the first two petition pages?  In addition to the mysterious blackouts, it&#8217;s clear that the last page of their fax/PDF (as opposed to the other two pages) is a blow up of just one section of a larger page.  </p>
<p>Given the recent record of hoaxes and frauds associated with BDS (see <a href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1259243065278&amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)" rel="nofollow">http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1259243065278&amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)</a>, forgive me for not taking &#8220;Labor for Palestine&#8221; at their word when they claim to know someone&#8217;s political views better than the person in whose name they are claiming to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428867</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428867</guid>
		<description>With all due respect to Labor for Palestine, what have they posted that connects the last (signature) page with the first two petition pages?  In addition to the mysterious blackouts, it&#039;s clear that the last page of their fax/PDF (as opposed to the other two pages) is a blow up of just one section of a larger page.  

Given the recent record of hoaxes and frauds associated with BDS (see http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1259243065278&amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull), forgive me for not taking &quot;Labor for Palestine&quot; at their word when they claim to know someone&#039;s political views better than the person in whose name they are claiming to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect to Labor for Palestine, what have they posted that connects the last (signature) page with the first two petition pages?  In addition to the mysterious blackouts, it&#8217;s clear that the last page of their fax/PDF (as opposed to the other two pages) is a blow up of just one section of a larger page.  </p>
<p>Given the recent record of hoaxes and frauds associated with BDS (see <a href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1259243065278&amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)" rel="nofollow">http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1259243065278&amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)</a>, forgive me for not taking &#8220;Labor for Palestine&#8221; at their word when they claim to know someone&#8217;s political views better than the person in whose name they are claiming to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428656</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428656</guid>
		<description>G. Bennet -- companies, yes.  but have a look at this, from the NLG&#039;s document:

&quot;BDS campaigns that are conceived independently, rather than as support for or in response to pressure by a hostile foreign government or in concert with the Arab League’s boycott of Israel, do not violate the anti-boycott laws. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G. Bennet &#8212; companies, yes.  but have a look at this, from the NLG&#8217;s document:</p>
<p>&#8220;BDS campaigns that are conceived independently, rather than as support for or in response to pressure by a hostile foreign government or in concert with the Arab League’s boycott of Israel, do not violate the anti-boycott laws. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428655</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428655</guid>
		<description>Labor for Palestine is now claiming that Brown &amp; another AFL-CIO member signed the letter at a Dec. 5 USLAW meeting in Chicago. they posted a copy of the signup letter here:

http://laborforpalestine.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/labor-for-palestine-response-to-defamatory-attacks-and-call-to-action/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labor for Palestine is now claiming that Brown &amp; another AFL-CIO member signed the letter at a Dec. 5 USLAW meeting in Chicago. they posted a copy of the signup letter here:</p>
<p><a href="http://laborforpalestine.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/labor-for-palestine-response-to-defamatory-attacks-and-call-to-action/" rel="nofollow">http://laborforpalestine.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/labor-for-palestine-response-to-defamatory-attacks-and-call-to-action/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Bennet</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428633</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Bennet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428633</guid>
		<description>Fred,
From my recent conversations with specialist American corporate lawyers, it seems to be pretty clear that a company that has an explicit or implicit policy to boycott Israel IS in breach of USA law.
I am not an expert, but according to these people (who are) American legislation on corporate wrongdoing is pretty strict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred,<br />
From my recent conversations with specialist American corporate lawyers, it seems to be pretty clear that a company that has an explicit or implicit policy to boycott Israel IS in breach of USA law.<br />
I am not an expert, but according to these people (who are) American legislation on corporate wrongdoing is pretty strict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428629</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428629</guid>
		<description>This is the Nat&#039;l Lawyers&#039; Guild FAQ on the anti-boycott law. Seems to conclude most BDS campaigns  don&#039;t run afoul of the law:
http://www.endtheoccupation.org/downloads/nlgboycott.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the Nat&#8217;l Lawyers&#8217; Guild FAQ on the anti-boycott law. Seems to conclude most BDS campaigns  don&#8217;t run afoul of the law:<br />
<a href="http://www.endtheoccupation.org/downloads/nlgboycott.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.endtheoccupation.org/downloads/nlgboycott.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Bennet</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428628</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Bennet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428628</guid>
		<description>Short version:

&quot;Antisemites lie&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short version:</p>
<p>&#8220;Antisemites lie&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428611</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428611</guid>
		<description>Amie,
Thanks for the link.

Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amie,<br />
Thanks for the link.</p>
<p>Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amie</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428494</link>
		<dc:creator>amie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428494</guid>
		<description>&quot;If companies participated in anit-Israeli boycotts, I think it would affect any government contract they might want to get&quot; No Stan, it is actually illegal, whether or not you want a gvt contract. It applies to all USindividuals and companies. There are swingeing penalties:
http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/antiboycottcompliance.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If companies participated in anit-Israeli boycotts, I think it would affect any government contract they might want to get&#8221; No Stan, it is actually illegal, whether or not you want a gvt contract. It applies to all USindividuals and companies. There are swingeing penalties:<br />
<a href="http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/antiboycottcompliance.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/antiboycottcompliance.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/21/boycott-israel-letter-includes-unauthorized-signature/comment-page-1/#comment-428487</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=25445#comment-428487</guid>
		<description>If companies participated in anit-Israeli boycotts, I think it would affect any government contract they might want to get.  But, individuals or Unions would be unlikely to be seeking government contracts.

Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If companies participated in anit-Israeli boycotts, I think it would affect any government contract they might want to get.  But, individuals or Unions would be unlikely to be seeking government contracts.</p>
<p>Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

