Comments on: On Being Purged By The SWP

By: Hamid

Hamid — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:40:17 +0000

Sue R – What riles me most is that Clare’s lying. On her own blog she says she cannot discuss the content of the emails or the facts behind the expulsion. And then she comes here without telling us the facts behind the expulsion, but saying “I am open for discussion, and see how good I am”.

As said before, she stares in your eyes and lies and obfuscates.

Just shows the character of these socialists and their Stalinist mentality – and they have the gall to call themselves “democrats”.

By: Hamid

Hamid — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:37:12 +0000

Sue R – What riles me most is that Clare’s lying. On her own blog she says she cannot discuss the content of the emails or the facts behind the expulsion. And then she comes here saying “I am open for discussion, and see how good I am”.

As said before, she stares in your eyes and lies and obfuscates.

Just shows the character of these socialists and their Stalinist mentality – and they have the gall to call themselves “democrats”.

By: Hamid

Hamid — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:32:16 +0000

Sue R – good question. I just see this religious like self-righteousness (“I am poor and I work for the masses, therefore I am better than you”) in everything she writes, and I take that as a personal insult. But true – I am worked up.

Thanks for the grammar lesson – as if anyone cares. Cant you come up with something better?

Lansbury – fact is that she is a loser, and she takes her personal anger against me and others in society. And yes – she has a low-paying job (probably cleaning lady from what she writes), if not unemployed and on government handouts. Facts speak for themselves.

By: British not Racist

British not Racist — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:30:11 +0000

Oh yes and one other thing, this Claire Solomon will end up a Tory, absolute certainty, no doubt about it.

Not so sure.
She could join Labour. Be a “reformed ex Trot”, like Alastair Darling,
get to the Lords, like Kinnock & Mrs K, who swore to abolish the Lords,
& run a tasty quango within 20 years.

Come to think of it, that is being a Tory.

By: Sue R

Sue R — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:20:00 +0000

Hamid: You seem to have taken Clare’s plight to heart personally. It’s ‘expulsion’ not ‘expellation’. Why are you getting worked up over what is basically a storm in a teacup?

By: Lansbury

Lansbury — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:20:29 +0000

Obviously you dont have a well-paying job.

Remember kids. When your restaurant or business fails you will also be assailed on the internet by people with poor reading skills.

By: Hamid

Hamid — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:37:05 +0000

Clare: Running a blog on your own is v time consuming and coz I tend to shy away from writing (& because I can’t afford Internet at home atm) it is easier to forward on other peoples writings and vids/photos etc.

So proud to be poor. In your belief system, that must be commendable. Obviously you dont have a well-paying job. Have you ever thought of acquiring better skills and better pay? No you are too busy revolutionizing because you are so oh so good at heart thinking of the masses at your own cost. In your soviet system, the state will pay you for having such a good heart. Therefore long live the revolution.

So what makes you think everyone subscribes to your belief system that poor people are better people? Oh so proud to be so poor. Disgusting.

By: zkharya

zkharya — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:53:19 +0000

O’Toole is right.

By: zkharya

zkharya — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:52:13 +0000

‘james o’toole said…

I wonder if he’s the idiot ‘James O’ who posts on LT?

By: Hamid

Hamid — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:31:10 +0000

Clare: I wrote the piece on my blog not because I wanted sympathy but because I think it is important for people to be able to discuss the issues at hand. To the person who doubts that I was expelled for sending some emails or whatever; of course these are only a few ‘provable’ facts. In the grand scheme of things I was expelled for what is called factionalising. The effectiveness of this method of organisng is something that is debated often.

Just shows how closed and illiberal you guys are. Nobody doubts that you were expelled because of the emails or factionalizing. But everyone doubts that “you want to discuss it”.

Stop lying to us Clare.

Read my comment again.

You are UNWILLING TO TELL US what was in those emails that caused you expellation.

Its amazing how Lefties look straight in your eyes, change the subject, provide obscure answers, and then claim they are open to discussion.

I dare you to be open to discussion and publish the relevant part of the emails or tell us what was the factionalizing charges. Joining a party you need to follow directions. It was not that you were insubordinate. It was ideological differences. Ideology is so paramount to cults. But you are unwilling to discuss.

Otherwise, stop lying to us that you are open for discussion.