<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professor David Miller and Neocon Europe – Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: quranist</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-420790</link>
		<dc:creator>quranist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-420790</guid>
		<description>The Quran confirms the Torah but attacks the Talmud. Jesus also attacked the Talmud in Mark 7:

Some people have said that the Koran says that the Torah and Gospel are corrupted and its no longer a book of guidance. They say &quot;Islam&quot; says so. Some Muslims even have said that anyone who still follows these scriptures is no longer a believer but a disbeliever and will go to hell. Indeed some Sunni/Shia scholars claim that any follower of islam who does not believe that the Jews and Christians are infidels is an infidel himself! However when asked to provide their evidence from the Koran they are mute and confused. This is because what they say and the Koran are complete opposites. Lets look at the Koran and what it say: 

Let the People of the Gospel judge by what God hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what God hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel. (Surah 5, Maida, verse 47) 

But why do they come to thee for decision, when they have (their own) Law before them?- Therein is the (plain) command of God; yet even after that, they would turn away. For they are not (really) people of faith. (Surah 5, Maida, verse 43) 

Then is it only a part of the Book that ye believe in, and do ye reject the rest? But what is the reward for those among you who behave like this but disgrace in this life? - And on the Day of Judgment they shall be consigned to the most grievous penalty. For God is not unmindful of what ye do. (Surah 2, Baqara, verse 85) 

Say: &quot;O People of the Book! Ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law, the Gospel and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord....&quot; (Surah 5, Al Ma&#039;idah, verse 68) 

If only they had stood fast by the Law, the Gospel, and all the revelation that was sent to them from their Lord, they would have enjoyed happiness from every side. There is from among them a party on the right course: But many of them follow a course that is evil. (Surah 5, Maida, verse 69) 

Of the people of Moses there is a section who guide and do justice in the light of truth. (Surah 7, A&#039;raf, verse 159) 

2.41 And believe in what I reveal, confirming the revelation which is with you, and be not the first to reject Faith therein, nor sell My Signs for a small price; and fear Me, and Me alone.

2.89 And when there comes to them a Book from God, confirming what is with them,- although from of old they had prayed for victory against those without Faith,- when there comes to them that which they (should) have recognized, they refuse to believe in it but the curse of Allah is on those without Faith.

Here the Koran clearly states the Koran confirms what is with them, meaning the scriptures of the Jews and Christians. Clearly this is not stating scriptures of the past but what they have possession of at the time the Koran was revealed. These scriptures are identical in every way to the scriptures these religions still have today known as the Old Testament and New Testament or the Bible as some call it. As I did my research about this subject some time ago I was looking for where this evidence of the tampering and corruption of the Bible is mentioned in the Koran as claimed by the Sunni/Shia sectarianist. How can God say the previous scriptures are corrupted then order them to follow them? It even attacks those who refuse to follow it and says its a path to salvation and mentions them in an equal footing as the Koran. 

2.79 Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:&quot;This is from God,&quot; to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. 

This is then used to support the tampering of the scriptures. However upon close examination, I see they failed to look at the verse before it and after it. 

2.78 And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book, but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. 

So the Koran is saying those poeple were making things up but never said the Book itself has been tampered since those people never knew the book and the follow up verses brings light to a religious scripture followed by the Judaic faith thats not the Old Testament.

2.80 And they say: &quot;The Fire shall not touch us but for a few numbered days:&quot; Say: &quot;Have ye taken a promise from God, for He never breaks His promise? or is it that ye say of God what ye do not know?&quot; 

This is not in the Torah but its refering to the Talmud. The supposed &quot;oral&quot; traditions the Rabbis say was passed down to them. The Talmud are the collections of the traditions of the so called Pharisees talked about in the Gospel who were fierce opponents of Jesus the Messiah.

The Rabbinic tradition arose from the Pharisaic tradition after the destruction of the Second Temple in AD 70. In general, it moved away from traditional Judaism&#039;s emphasis on an earthly future for Israel toward the concept of reward in the life to come.[4] Gehinom (Gehenna), according to rabbinic literature, is a place or state where the wicked are temporarily punished after death. “Gehenna” is sometimes translated as &quot;hell&quot;, but the Christian view of hell differs from the Jewish view of Gehenna. Most sinners are said to suffer in Gehenna no longer than twelve months.Those who are too wicked to reach paradise are sometimes said to be punished forever.[5] Other accounts reject the idea that a merciful God would punish anyone forever,[6] in which case those too wicked for purification are destroyed (see annihilationism) 
Gehenna - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 

Also in the Talmud: 

Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (&quot;Cuthean&quot;) the wages owed him for work. 

The Koran condemned this:
3.75. Among the People of the Book are some who, if entrusted with a hoard of gold, will (readily) pay it back; others, who, if entrusted with a single silver coin, will not repay it unless thou constantly stoodest demanding, because, they say, &quot;there is no call on us (to keep faith) with these ignorant (Pagans).&quot; but they tell a lie against God, and (well) they know it. 

Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus&#039; mother was a whore: &quot;She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.&quot; Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the &quot;uncensored&quot; text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, &quot;Miriam the hairdresser,&quot; had sex with many men. 

4.156 Quran 
That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge; 

The famous warning of Jesus Christ about the tradition of men that voids Scripture (Mark 7:1-13), is in fact, a direct reference to the Talmud, or more specifically, the forerunner of the first part of it, the Mishnah, which existed in oral form during Christ&#039;s lifetime, before being committed to writing. Mark chapter 7, from verse one through thirteen, represents Our Lord&#039;s pointed condemnation of the Mishnah

Also: 

The Schindler&#039;s List Quote 

The Talmud (i.e., the Babylonian Talmud) text of Sanhedrin 37a restricts the duty to save life to saving only Jewish lives. 

The book on Hebrew censorship, written by Jews themselves (Hesronot Ha-shas), notes that some Talmud texts use the universalist phrase: 

&quot;Whoever destroys the life of a single human being...it is as if he had destroyed an entire world; and whoever preserves the life of a single human being ...it is as if he had preserved an entire world.&quot; 

However, Hesronot Ha-shas points out that these are not the authentic words of the original Talmud. 

In other words, the preceding universalist rendering is not the authentic text of the Talmud and thus, for example, this universalist version which Steven Spielberg in his famous movie, Schindler&#039;s List attributed to the Talmud (and which became the motto of the movie on posters and in advertisements), is a hoax and constitutes propaganda intended to give a humanistic gloss to a Talmud which is, in its essence, racist and chauvinist hate literature. 

In the authentic, original Talmud text it states that &quot;whoever preserves a single soul of Israel, it is as if he had preserved an entire world&quot; (emphasis supplied). The authentic Talmud text sanctions only the saving of Jewish lives. 

The Koran tells us about this and condemns this: 

5.32 On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land 

&quot;According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned. 

&quot;The more popular accounts--which were nevertheless taken quite seriously--such as the notorious Toldot Yeshu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name &#039;Jesus&#039; was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable and this popular tradition still persists... 

The koran tells us: 

4.157. That they said (in boast), &quot;We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of God.;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- 

The Talmud then say: 

Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations. 

Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament (&quot;uncanonical books&quot;) will have no portion in the world to come. 

Shabbath 116a. Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament. 

The koran responds by: 

And they say: &quot;None shall enter Paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian.&quot; Those are their (vain) desires. Say: &quot;Produce your proof if ye are truthful.&quot;Nay,-whoever submits His whole self to God and is a doer of good,- He will get his reward with his Lord; on such shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. The Jews say: &quot;The Christians have naught (to stand) upon; and the Christians say: &quot;The Jews have naught (To stand) upon.&quot; Yet they study the (same) Book. Like unto their word is what those say who know not; but God will judge between them in their quarrel on the Day of Judgment. 2.111-113 

“Non-Jewish property belongs to the Jew who uses it first” - (Babba Bathra 54b)

“If two Jews have deceived a Non-Jew, they have to split the profit” - (Choschen Ham 183,7)

“Every Jew is allowed to use lies and perjury to bring a Non-Jew to ruin” - (Babha Kama 113a)

“The Jew is allowed to practice usury on the Non-Jew” - (Talmud IV/2/70b)

The koran then says:

4.160. For the iniquity of the Jews We made unlawful for them certain (foods) good and wholesome which had been lawful for them;- in that they hindered many from God&#039;s Way;- 
4.161. That they took usury, though they were forbidden; and that they devoured men&#039;s substance wrongfully;- we have prepared for those among them who reject faith a grievous punishment. 

Note: The Torah forbids the Jews from the devouring of Usury (&quot;neshek&quot;).See the Old Testament Ex. 22: 25; 
Le. 25: 36-37; De. 23:19-20; Ne. 5: 7/10; Ps. 15: 5; Pr. 28:8

The Koran then says:

4.162. But those among them who are well-grounded in knowledge, and the believers, believe in what hath been revealed to thee and what was revealed before thee: And (especially) those who establish regular prayer and practise regular charity and believe in God and in the Last Day: To them shall We soon give a great reward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Quran confirms the Torah but attacks the Talmud. Jesus also attacked the Talmud in Mark 7:</p>
<p>Some people have said that the Koran says that the Torah and Gospel are corrupted and its no longer a book of guidance. They say &#8220;Islam&#8221; says so. Some Muslims even have said that anyone who still follows these scriptures is no longer a believer but a disbeliever and will go to hell. Indeed some Sunni/Shia scholars claim that any follower of islam who does not believe that the Jews and Christians are infidels is an infidel himself! However when asked to provide their evidence from the Koran they are mute and confused. This is because what they say and the Koran are complete opposites. Lets look at the Koran and what it say: </p>
<p>Let the People of the Gospel judge by what God hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what God hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel. (Surah 5, Maida, verse 47) </p>
<p>But why do they come to thee for decision, when they have (their own) Law before them?- Therein is the (plain) command of God; yet even after that, they would turn away. For they are not (really) people of faith. (Surah 5, Maida, verse 43) </p>
<p>Then is it only a part of the Book that ye believe in, and do ye reject the rest? But what is the reward for those among you who behave like this but disgrace in this life? &#8211; And on the Day of Judgment they shall be consigned to the most grievous penalty. For God is not unmindful of what ye do. (Surah 2, Baqara, verse 85) </p>
<p>Say: &#8220;O People of the Book! Ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law, the Gospel and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord&#8230;.&#8221; (Surah 5, Al Ma&#8217;idah, verse 68) </p>
<p>If only they had stood fast by the Law, the Gospel, and all the revelation that was sent to them from their Lord, they would have enjoyed happiness from every side. There is from among them a party on the right course: But many of them follow a course that is evil. (Surah 5, Maida, verse 69) </p>
<p>Of the people of Moses there is a section who guide and do justice in the light of truth. (Surah 7, A&#8217;raf, verse 159) </p>
<p>2.41 And believe in what I reveal, confirming the revelation which is with you, and be not the first to reject Faith therein, nor sell My Signs for a small price; and fear Me, and Me alone.</p>
<p>2.89 And when there comes to them a Book from God, confirming what is with them,- although from of old they had prayed for victory against those without Faith,- when there comes to them that which they (should) have recognized, they refuse to believe in it but the curse of Allah is on those without Faith.</p>
<p>Here the Koran clearly states the Koran confirms what is with them, meaning the scriptures of the Jews and Christians. Clearly this is not stating scriptures of the past but what they have possession of at the time the Koran was revealed. These scriptures are identical in every way to the scriptures these religions still have today known as the Old Testament and New Testament or the Bible as some call it. As I did my research about this subject some time ago I was looking for where this evidence of the tampering and corruption of the Bible is mentioned in the Koran as claimed by the Sunni/Shia sectarianist. How can God say the previous scriptures are corrupted then order them to follow them? It even attacks those who refuse to follow it and says its a path to salvation and mentions them in an equal footing as the Koran. </p>
<p>2.79 Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:&#8221;This is from God,&#8221; to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. </p>
<p>This is then used to support the tampering of the scriptures. However upon close examination, I see they failed to look at the verse before it and after it. </p>
<p>2.78 And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book, but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. </p>
<p>So the Koran is saying those poeple were making things up but never said the Book itself has been tampered since those people never knew the book and the follow up verses brings light to a religious scripture followed by the Judaic faith thats not the Old Testament.</p>
<p>2.80 And they say: &#8220;The Fire shall not touch us but for a few numbered days:&#8221; Say: &#8220;Have ye taken a promise from God, for He never breaks His promise? or is it that ye say of God what ye do not know?&#8221; </p>
<p>This is not in the Torah but its refering to the Talmud. The supposed &#8220;oral&#8221; traditions the Rabbis say was passed down to them. The Talmud are the collections of the traditions of the so called Pharisees talked about in the Gospel who were fierce opponents of Jesus the Messiah.</p>
<p>The Rabbinic tradition arose from the Pharisaic tradition after the destruction of the Second Temple in AD 70. In general, it moved away from traditional Judaism&#8217;s emphasis on an earthly future for Israel toward the concept of reward in the life to come.[4] Gehinom (Gehenna), according to rabbinic literature, is a place or state where the wicked are temporarily punished after death. “Gehenna” is sometimes translated as &#8220;hell&#8221;, but the Christian view of hell differs from the Jewish view of Gehenna. Most sinners are said to suffer in Gehenna no longer than twelve months.Those who are too wicked to reach paradise are sometimes said to be punished forever.[5] Other accounts reject the idea that a merciful God would punish anyone forever,[6] in which case those too wicked for purification are destroyed (see annihilationism)<br />
Gehenna &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia </p>
<p>Also in the Talmud: </p>
<p>Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (&#8220;Cuthean&#8221;) the wages owed him for work. </p>
<p>The Koran condemned this:<br />
3.75. Among the People of the Book are some who, if entrusted with a hoard of gold, will (readily) pay it back; others, who, if entrusted with a single silver coin, will not repay it unless thou constantly stoodest demanding, because, they say, &#8220;there is no call on us (to keep faith) with these ignorant (Pagans).&#8221; but they tell a lie against God, and (well) they know it. </p>
<p>Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus&#8217; mother was a whore: &#8220;She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.&#8221; Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the &#8220;uncensored&#8221; text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, &#8220;Miriam the hairdresser,&#8221; had sex with many men. </p>
<p>4.156 Quran<br />
That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge; </p>
<p>The famous warning of Jesus Christ about the tradition of men that voids Scripture (Mark 7:1-13), is in fact, a direct reference to the Talmud, or more specifically, the forerunner of the first part of it, the Mishnah, which existed in oral form during Christ&#8217;s lifetime, before being committed to writing. Mark chapter 7, from verse one through thirteen, represents Our Lord&#8217;s pointed condemnation of the Mishnah</p>
<p>Also: </p>
<p>The Schindler&#8217;s List Quote </p>
<p>The Talmud (i.e., the Babylonian Talmud) text of Sanhedrin 37a restricts the duty to save life to saving only Jewish lives. </p>
<p>The book on Hebrew censorship, written by Jews themselves (Hesronot Ha-shas), notes that some Talmud texts use the universalist phrase: </p>
<p>&#8220;Whoever destroys the life of a single human being&#8230;it is as if he had destroyed an entire world; and whoever preserves the life of a single human being &#8230;it is as if he had preserved an entire world.&#8221; </p>
<p>However, Hesronot Ha-shas points out that these are not the authentic words of the original Talmud. </p>
<p>In other words, the preceding universalist rendering is not the authentic text of the Talmud and thus, for example, this universalist version which Steven Spielberg in his famous movie, Schindler&#8217;s List attributed to the Talmud (and which became the motto of the movie on posters and in advertisements), is a hoax and constitutes propaganda intended to give a humanistic gloss to a Talmud which is, in its essence, racist and chauvinist hate literature. </p>
<p>In the authentic, original Talmud text it states that &#8220;whoever preserves a single soul of Israel, it is as if he had preserved an entire world&#8221; (emphasis supplied). The authentic Talmud text sanctions only the saving of Jewish lives. </p>
<p>The Koran tells us about this and condemns this: </p>
<p>5.32 On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person &#8211; unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land &#8211; it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land </p>
<p>&#8220;According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned. </p>
<p>&#8220;The more popular accounts&#8211;which were nevertheless taken quite seriously&#8211;such as the notorious Toldot Yeshu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name &#8216;Jesus&#8217; was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable and this popular tradition still persists&#8230; </p>
<p>The koran tells us: </p>
<p>4.157. That they said (in boast), &#8220;We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of God.;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- </p>
<p>The Talmud then say: </p>
<p>Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations. </p>
<p>Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament (&#8220;uncanonical books&#8221;) will have no portion in the world to come. </p>
<p>Shabbath 116a. Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament. </p>
<p>The koran responds by: </p>
<p>And they say: &#8220;None shall enter Paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian.&#8221; Those are their (vain) desires. Say: &#8220;Produce your proof if ye are truthful.&#8221;Nay,-whoever submits His whole self to God and is a doer of good,- He will get his reward with his Lord; on such shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. The Jews say: &#8220;The Christians have naught (to stand) upon; and the Christians say: &#8220;The Jews have naught (To stand) upon.&#8221; Yet they study the (same) Book. Like unto their word is what those say who know not; but God will judge between them in their quarrel on the Day of Judgment. 2.111-113 </p>
<p>“Non-Jewish property belongs to the Jew who uses it first” &#8211; (Babba Bathra 54b)</p>
<p>“If two Jews have deceived a Non-Jew, they have to split the profit” &#8211; (Choschen Ham 183,7)</p>
<p>“Every Jew is allowed to use lies and perjury to bring a Non-Jew to ruin” &#8211; (Babha Kama 113a)</p>
<p>“The Jew is allowed to practice usury on the Non-Jew” &#8211; (Talmud IV/2/70b)</p>
<p>The koran then says:</p>
<p>4.160. For the iniquity of the Jews We made unlawful for them certain (foods) good and wholesome which had been lawful for them;- in that they hindered many from God&#8217;s Way;-<br />
4.161. That they took usury, though they were forbidden; and that they devoured men&#8217;s substance wrongfully;- we have prepared for those among them who reject faith a grievous punishment. </p>
<p>Note: The Torah forbids the Jews from the devouring of Usury (&#8220;neshek&#8221;).See the Old Testament Ex. 22: 25;<br />
Le. 25: 36-37; De. 23:19-20; Ne. 5: 7/10; Ps. 15: 5; Pr. 28:8</p>
<p>The Koran then says:</p>
<p>4.162. But those among them who are well-grounded in knowledge, and the believers, believe in what hath been revealed to thee and what was revealed before thee: And (especially) those who establish regular prayer and practise regular charity and believe in God and in the Last Day: To them shall We soon give a great reward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kits</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418653</link>
		<dc:creator>Kits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418653</guid>
		<description>I recall David Miller being a Medialenser for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall David Miller being a Medialenser for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne T</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418647</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418647</guid>
		<description>Kevin MacDonald’s arguments about Jews and Judaism — originally expressed in four books he published between 1994 and 2004 — mimic those made by anti-Semites during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. MacDonald argues that Judaism is a particularly successful “group evolutionary strategy” that allows Jews to benefit at the expense of non-Jews, and that anti-Semitism is a “rational” non-Jewish response to counteract Jewish successes. MacDonald believes that Jews in contemporary times have fostered and supported multiculturalism, Zionism, and neo-conservatism to benefit Jews at the expense of non-Jews.

[...]

MacDonald thinks Jews are characterized by four “background traits”: elevated intelligence, hyperethnocentrism, aggressiveness, and psychological intensity which, when combined, make Jews a “formidable” and “effective” group, capable of dominating other groups. MacDonald sees Jewish intelligence, in particular (which he attributes to alleged “eugenics-style” breeding practices among Jews), as responsible for Jews’ purported ability to transform non-Jewish society for their own benefit. This intelligence is biological, MacDonald claims, and confers, at least upon Ashkenazi Jews, “the highest average intelligence of any human group.” He also believes it grants Jews a “tendency” to amass wealth, a further source of collective Jewish power.


Er, so the Nazis had it backward. The Jews are the master race and the Nazis and latter day anti-semites are just running scared of us.

MacDonald must be one hell of an expert on Jews to exclude non-Ashkenazim, though. The Jews of Iraq were targeted by the Bathists and Arabists in the first half of the 20th century because they were well represented in the middle class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin MacDonald’s arguments about Jews and Judaism — originally expressed in four books he published between 1994 and 2004 — mimic those made by anti-Semites during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. MacDonald argues that Judaism is a particularly successful “group evolutionary strategy” that allows Jews to benefit at the expense of non-Jews, and that anti-Semitism is a “rational” non-Jewish response to counteract Jewish successes. MacDonald believes that Jews in contemporary times have fostered and supported multiculturalism, Zionism, and neo-conservatism to benefit Jews at the expense of non-Jews.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>MacDonald thinks Jews are characterized by four “background traits”: elevated intelligence, hyperethnocentrism, aggressiveness, and psychological intensity which, when combined, make Jews a “formidable” and “effective” group, capable of dominating other groups. MacDonald sees Jewish intelligence, in particular (which he attributes to alleged “eugenics-style” breeding practices among Jews), as responsible for Jews’ purported ability to transform non-Jewish society for their own benefit. This intelligence is biological, MacDonald claims, and confers, at least upon Ashkenazi Jews, “the highest average intelligence of any human group.” He also believes it grants Jews a “tendency” to amass wealth, a further source of collective Jewish power.</p>
<p>Er, so the Nazis had it backward. The Jews are the master race and the Nazis and latter day anti-semites are just running scared of us.</p>
<p>MacDonald must be one hell of an expert on Jews to exclude non-Ashkenazim, though. The Jews of Iraq were targeted by the Bathists and Arabists in the first half of the 20th century because they were well represented in the middle class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slimey</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418593</link>
		<dc:creator>slimey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418593</guid>
		<description>Adrian Morgan  	     	
	  1 December 2009, 4:24 pm

I must say I normally get on with Richard, and he is decent in many ways, but I did get a load of crap. What galled me was the “guilt by association tactic” that seemed to be used to attack people. 

How very dare they!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian Morgan<br />
	  1 December 2009, 4:24 pm</p>
<p>I must say I normally get on with Richard, and he is decent in many ways, but I did get a load of crap. What galled me was the “guilt by association tactic” that seemed to be used to attack people. </p>
<p>How very dare they!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418548</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418548</guid>
		<description>&quot; MacDonald thinks Jews are characterized by four “background traits”: elevated intelligence, hyperethnocentrism, aggressiveness, and psychological intensity which, when combined, make Jews a “formidable” and “effective” group, capable of dominating other groups.&quot;

I would just edit his depiction of the Jews a little bit for greater accuracy. How&#039;s this:

Jews are characterized by five “background traits”: elevated intelligence, nice sense of humor, tendency study hard, creativity, and psychological neuroses or just plain silliness which, when combined, make an above-average number of Jews effective in life or at least rather interesting people.

I know, &quot;elevated intelligence.&quot; But I&#039;d like to think that, even if it has no scientific basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; MacDonald thinks Jews are characterized by four “background traits”: elevated intelligence, hyperethnocentrism, aggressiveness, and psychological intensity which, when combined, make Jews a “formidable” and “effective” group, capable of dominating other groups.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would just edit his depiction of the Jews a little bit for greater accuracy. How&#8217;s this:</p>
<p>Jews are characterized by five “background traits”: elevated intelligence, nice sense of humor, tendency study hard, creativity, and psychological neuroses or just plain silliness which, when combined, make an above-average number of Jews effective in life or at least rather interesting people.</p>
<p>I know, &#8220;elevated intelligence.&#8221; But I&#8217;d like to think that, even if it has no scientific basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Morgan</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418508</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418508</guid>
		<description>Is this not the same bloke who will be supervising PhDs with Osama Saeed, and the same place where Mick Napier indoctrinates?

He could be. He has certainly been involved with &quot;anti-racism&quot; groups that appear to brand Israelis as racists, which have involved both Mike Napier and Osama Saeed:

http://www.scotlandagainstracism.com/onescotland/files/FOI%20-%2000758%20-%201.pdf

And Napier has been involved with activism in Miller&#039;s university:

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Spirit-of-Sixties-revived-as.4971848.jp

&lt;i&gt;Students at Strathclyde, Glasgow and Dundee universities have urged their institutions to denounce the Gaza assault and cut all links with Israeli organisations. Mick Napier, of the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (SPSC), said: &quot;It destroys the myth of student apathy.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

And in another Strathclyde venture attended by Napier, criticism of Israel is &quot;not racism&quot;. Well I never....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/25796</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this not the same bloke who will be supervising PhDs with Osama Saeed, and the same place where Mick Napier indoctrinates?</p>
<p>He could be. He has certainly been involved with &#8220;anti-racism&#8221; groups that appear to brand Israelis as racists, which have involved both Mike Napier and Osama Saeed:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scotlandagainstracism.com/onescotland/files/FOI%20-%2000758%20-%201.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.scotlandagainstracism.com/onescotland/files/FOI%20-%2000758%20-%201.pdf</a></p>
<p>And Napier has been involved with activism in Miller&#8217;s university:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Spirit-of-Sixties-revived-as.4971848.jp" rel="nofollow">http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Spirit-of-Sixties-revived-as.4971848.jp</a></p>
<p><i>Students at Strathclyde, Glasgow and Dundee universities have urged their institutions to denounce the Gaza assault and cut all links with Israeli organisations. Mick Napier, of the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (SPSC), said: &#8220;It destroys the myth of student apathy.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>And in another Strathclyde venture attended by Napier, criticism of Israel is &#8220;not racism&#8221;. Well I never&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/25796" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/25796</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMS</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418459</link>
		<dc:creator>GMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418459</guid>
		<description>Is this not the same bloke who will be supervising PhDs with Osama Saeed, and the same place where Mick Napier indoctrinates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this not the same bloke who will be supervising PhDs with Osama Saeed, and the same place where Mick Napier indoctrinates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Morgan</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418452</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418452</guid>
		<description>I must say I normally get on with Richard, and he is decent in many ways, but I did get a load of crap. What galled me was the &quot;guilt by association tactic&quot; that seemed to be used to attack people. 

I felt that I was being highlighted as a way to get at other people who were the real targets - and though I would never state that Richard consciously intended that, it was a specific tactic that was used by the Strathclyde brigade.

Richard is a decent cove, I will admit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say I normally get on with Richard, and he is decent in many ways, but I did get a load of crap. What galled me was the &#8220;guilt by association tactic&#8221; that seemed to be used to attack people. </p>
<p>I felt that I was being highlighted as a way to get at other people who were the real targets &#8211; and though I would never state that Richard consciously intended that, it was a specific tactic that was used by the Strathclyde brigade.</p>
<p>Richard is a decent cove, I will admit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David T</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418446</link>
		<dc:creator>David T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418446</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, I think it was others who made the bad faith &#039;right wing alliance&#039; type claims. 

Richard was being mischievous and jolly, I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I think it was others who made the bad faith &#8216;right wing alliance&#8217; type claims. </p>
<p>Richard was being mischievous and jolly, I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Morgan</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/12/01/professor-david-miller-and-neocon-europe-%e2%80%93-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418415</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=24539#comment-418415</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I considered the whole incident to be humorous fiasco of the sort one might read of in a Diary column item, rather than as evidence of a new right-wing alliance&lt;/i&gt;

So you therefore agree that David Miller publishes material (which claims that there is exactly this &quot;new right-wing alliance&quot;)  that is salacious and misleading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I considered the whole incident to be humorous fiasco of the sort one might read of in a Diary column item, rather than as evidence of a new right-wing alliance</i></p>
<p>So you therefore agree that David Miller publishes material (which claims that there is exactly this &#8220;new right-wing alliance&#8221;)  that is salacious and misleading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

