What rubbish! Of course it’s genocide!! How can it not be when of the vibrant community of 800,000 in 1948 there is now only a pitiful remnant of 4 million??!? It’s an outrage!!!!

Your remaining citations are apparently material she took on faith from others. I’ll have to investigate further, but I’m not so sure that makes Geller’s every word evil.

By the way, her name is Geller not Gellar. Not even knowing her name correctly makes me wonder whether those demonising her are that accurate.

[t]he Court concludes that the acts committed at Srebrenica falling within Article II (a) and (b) of the Convention were committed with the specific intent to destroy in part the group of the Muslims of Bosnia and Herzegovina as such; and accordingly that these were acts of genocide, committed by members of the VRS in and around Srebrenica from about 13 July 1995.

Gellars view is that: The real Srebrenica Genocide not reported by the corrupt, racist pro-Islamist-Nazi Western corporate-controlled media, was the brutal mass murder – using axes, knives, daggers, sledgehammers, iron bars, flamethrowers and explosives – of 3,870 Serbian elderly men, women and young children in and around the town of Srebrenica and its adjoining towns and villages(Bratunac,Skelani,Milici, et al) as well as the town of Gorazde.

or this which she quotes approvingly from Nathan Pearlstein:

We all remember the Western media hoaxes and fakery concerning the events in Jenin and Qana recently and how these media frauds were used to demonize Israel and the Jewish people. So it is absolutely crucial that we also expose the Western media fraud concerning the events in Srebrenica, Bosnia in July, 1995, in order to reveal just how corrupt and dishonest the Western media, the US, NATO and EU Imperialist governments are when they turn the world upside down by demonizing the victims of a massacre in order to prop up the Islamofascist perpetrators

She also regularly reproduces the work of deniers like the ‘intrepid’ Julia “Srebrenica Party Weekend” Gorin and Robert North.

“Given a choice between the alleged Islamophobia of Lewis and Spencer and the alleged Islamophilia of the left, the safer and perhaps wiser choice is the former.”

I’ll drink to that. While I still can….

As for Pamela Geller being a genocide denier, that is absolute nonsense. Unless you accept that Israel defending itself against “Palestinians” constitutes a genocide. If so it is a very ineffective one since the population of the “Palestinians” is burgeoning.

I should of course make a correction to my previous post.
Where I wrote “holocaust denier”it should be replaced by “genocide denier”–as reffered to by both yourself and hasan prishtina.
A laps of concentration due to tiredness.My apologies.

Well,look.I know of several areas of white flight/ethnic cleansing tacking place throughout western Europe,due entirely to the psychopathic, relentless and pervasive existential threat to non-Muslims,by Muslim “yooves”.
Incremental , insidious,tribal,cultural,Urban Jihad.
If the “genocide denial” by Gellar you refer to, is concerning Palestine—I have a question.
Which “Palestine”are you reffering to?
The one in London AD 2025
The one in Denmark AD2026
The one in Brussels AD 2027
The one in Paris AD 2028
The one in Malmo,Sweden AD 2029
Or the one in Rottredam,The Netherlands,AD 2030.
And if so,do you recommend a two-state solution.? Or just plain old semi-autonomy Sharia-compliant, Dar-al-Salam.

Unfortunately, journeyman, even some Jews and some “dedicated anti-Islamo-Fascists” are capable of denying genocide.

“However Gellar is,without question,a denier of genocide as ruled by the International Court of Justice”

That is highly unlikely as I suspect you well know.Because Gellar as you also well know–is a Jew and dedicated anti-Islamo-Fascist campaigner.

The wording of your statement could mislead lesser mortals into believing that— either the International Court of Justice is of the opinion that Gellar is a “holocaust denier” or that Gellar qualifies all of the Courts criteria–as a “holocaust denier”.

Whereas,I am more inclined to interpret you statement in this way.

You,have for one reason or another,made your own personal interpretation or conclusion as to what you think are the criteria that the International Court of Justice follows to reach such a conclusion.
Is this not so.?Please elaborate in detail and clarify as to which of my above interpretations are correct.

journeyman

I told you the answer in the post to which you’re replying; it’s even in the bit you quoted. I suggest you go to her website, press ‘Search,’ enter ‘Charles Johnson’ and read. It’s not difficult.

Nazi is indeed a serious charge and one consistently upheld by the courts in Belgium.

As is “support of genocide”.

I don’t know to whom this refers, because I didn’t make the charge. However Gellar is, without question, a denier of genocide as ruled by the International Court of Justice.