<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defend Peter Tatchell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek Wall</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-4/#comment-409078</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-409078</guid>
		<description>George Galloway has put out a call to support Peter Tatchell at the General Election, good news http://another-green-world.blogspot.com/2009/11/respect-conference-in-birmingham-today.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway has put out a call to support Peter Tatchell at the General Election, good news <a href="http://another-green-world.blogspot.com/2009/11/respect-conference-in-birmingham-today.html" rel="nofollow">http://another-green-world.blogspot.com/2009/11/respect-conference-in-birmingham-today.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delaware Payday Loans</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-4/#comment-407509</link>
		<dc:creator>Delaware Payday Loans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-407509</guid>
		<description>Tatchell right now is a very confused individual. Still, I respect him for his stands in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tatchell right now is a very confused individual. Still, I respect him for his stands in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-4/#comment-406397</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-406397</guid>
		<description>PS. Sorry, I also forgot to mention that I am appalled that people are accusing Dr Jin Haritaworn, Tamsila Tauqir and Esra Erdem of having made up their names or some shit like that. Apparently people are offended that they are not called Jim, Tamsin and Ernest (ie. they are offended that these people are not white and do not have white people names).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS. Sorry, I also forgot to mention that I am appalled that people are accusing Dr Jin Haritaworn, Tamsila Tauqir and Esra Erdem of having made up their names or some shit like that. Apparently people are offended that they are not called Jim, Tamsin and Ernest (ie. they are offended that these people are not white and do not have white people names).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-4/#comment-406376</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-406376</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else see a pattern here? People of colour have a problem with Peter Tatchell, and white people think he is fine and not racist. Um... wtf?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else see a pattern here? People of colour have a problem with Peter Tatchell, and white people think he is fine and not racist. Um&#8230; wtf?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester Holloway</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-4/#comment-404759</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Holloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-404759</guid>
		<description>As regular readers of this site will have noticed, billaricaydickey (aka Terry Fitzpatrick) is obsessed with me. I have several times before had to put on record outright denials at his outrageous lies, accusing me of all sorts of things. And once again I wish to state for the record that I have to set the record straight. I have not written homophobic articles for New Nation, The Voice or anywhere else. Plain and simple.

Each one of billaricaydickey&#039;s allegations against me on this site are libellous, however rather than take any action I have simply put in writing a rebuttal. But this really is getting too much, because it is an ongoing pattern, with one obsessed person continuing to make unfounded and damaging allegations. Quite simply it cannot go on like this on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As regular readers of this site will have noticed, billaricaydickey (aka Terry Fitzpatrick) is obsessed with me. I have several times before had to put on record outright denials at his outrageous lies, accusing me of all sorts of things. And once again I wish to state for the record that I have to set the record straight. I have not written homophobic articles for New Nation, The Voice or anywhere else. Plain and simple.</p>
<p>Each one of billaricaydickey&#8217;s allegations against me on this site are libellous, however rather than take any action I have simply put in writing a rebuttal. But this really is getting too much, because it is an ongoing pattern, with one obsessed person continuing to make unfounded and damaging allegations. Quite simply it cannot go on like this on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix (Italy)</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-4/#comment-404336</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix (Italy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-404336</guid>
		<description>Tail end of Tatchell

Vernichka, all German diminutives with the -chen ending are neuter.
Maedchen comes from Magd, which in older German meant woman; now it means &#039;maid&#039; which does historically, I suppose, suggest an association between woman and servant. Maedchen is a small woman as in girl.

I find the neuter here quite delicious; it slips out of the male-female gender connotations. It has a soft sound - the ch is a very soft guttural - and throws a soothing light on many a German poem. Language can transform in-built prejudice inside out and make the &#039;error&#039; come out on top as a virtue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tail end of Tatchell</p>
<p>Vernichka, all German diminutives with the -chen ending are neuter.<br />
Maedchen comes from Magd, which in older German meant woman; now it means &#8216;maid&#8217; which does historically, I suppose, suggest an association between woman and servant. Maedchen is a small woman as in girl.</p>
<p>I find the neuter here quite delicious; it slips out of the male-female gender connotations. It has a soft sound &#8211; the ch is a very soft guttural &#8211; and throws a soothing light on many a German poem. Language can transform in-built prejudice inside out and make the &#8216;error&#8217; come out on top as a virtue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venichka</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-4/#comment-404228</link>
		<dc:creator>Venichka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-404228</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In German the moon is masculine and the sun is feminine.&lt;/i&gt;

Not to mention &quot;girl&quot; being neuter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In German the moon is masculine and the sun is feminine.</i></p>
<p>Not to mention &#8220;girl&#8221; being neuter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix (Italy)</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-4/#comment-404087</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix (Italy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-404087</guid>
		<description>MoreInsaneNonsense

&quot; I’m surprised Judy didn’t call you out on your pejorative use of the word “lunatic”. We should all be aware of its sexist connotations re the genderization of the moon...&quot;

In German the moon is masculine and the sun is feminine.

If the normal sexuality of men is considered rape, Oh to be raped! But this usage cheapens the real significance of the word.

The hysterical female feminist sticklers for political correctness are, in a very real sense, Rapists of the mind, as evinced in the stories told above. Mental rape can be as serious as physical rape, but it is not punished. Castration is what they have in mind, but secretly they still want the potential rapist.

It is most unfortunate that many feminists want to become like their enemies, the men who hector over underlings at the office, for example.

In London once I met a woman, for whom I was doing a translation, at her home. When her man showed his head in the doorway he was commanded left right and centre until he hid behind a large pot plant.

In Portugal I lived in a house with, by chance, Germans and there the women ruled with a rod of iron and the men were cringing about the place, afraid of putting a foot wrong. In this particular case - by coincidence - the men were beautiful, sensitive and had expresive poetic depths in their eyes. I was thrown out for rebelling against this Amazonian rule.

I know these are particular examples but the are or once were typical.

Well, I have had my share - one of the regular toughs on HP called me a faggot and a Drama Queen - after absorbing the initial intention of being nasty, I love it. And Gene came to my rescue.

I was filled with unspeakable joy when Colonel Honeyball, the Latin teacher, said, &quot;Felix, you have the mind of a butterfly and a female one at that.&quot;

Yes, naturally Peter Tatchell would be called a Narcissist, though he seems to have put himself out a great deal for other people. He is a myth as he was already around years ago when I lived in London.

I always think of Narcissus as being completely self-forgetful. After all he doesn&#039;t know that he is looking at his own image in the water. His beauty drifts away into eternity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MoreInsaneNonsense</p>
<p>&#8221; I’m surprised Judy didn’t call you out on your pejorative use of the word “lunatic”. We should all be aware of its sexist connotations re the genderization of the moon&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>In German the moon is masculine and the sun is feminine.</p>
<p>If the normal sexuality of men is considered rape, Oh to be raped! But this usage cheapens the real significance of the word.</p>
<p>The hysterical female feminist sticklers for political correctness are, in a very real sense, Rapists of the mind, as evinced in the stories told above. Mental rape can be as serious as physical rape, but it is not punished. Castration is what they have in mind, but secretly they still want the potential rapist.</p>
<p>It is most unfortunate that many feminists want to become like their enemies, the men who hector over underlings at the office, for example.</p>
<p>In London once I met a woman, for whom I was doing a translation, at her home. When her man showed his head in the doorway he was commanded left right and centre until he hid behind a large pot plant.</p>
<p>In Portugal I lived in a house with, by chance, Germans and there the women ruled with a rod of iron and the men were cringing about the place, afraid of putting a foot wrong. In this particular case &#8211; by coincidence &#8211; the men were beautiful, sensitive and had expresive poetic depths in their eyes. I was thrown out for rebelling against this Amazonian rule.</p>
<p>I know these are particular examples but the are or once were typical.</p>
<p>Well, I have had my share &#8211; one of the regular toughs on HP called me a faggot and a Drama Queen &#8211; after absorbing the initial intention of being nasty, I love it. And Gene came to my rescue.</p>
<p>I was filled with unspeakable joy when Colonel Honeyball, the Latin teacher, said, &#8220;Felix, you have the mind of a butterfly and a female one at that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, naturally Peter Tatchell would be called a Narcissist, though he seems to have put himself out a great deal for other people. He is a myth as he was already around years ago when I lived in London.</p>
<p>I always think of Narcissus as being completely self-forgetful. After all he doesn&#8217;t know that he is looking at his own image in the water. His beauty drifts away into eternity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camsky</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-3/#comment-404073</link>
		<dc:creator>camsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-404073</guid>
		<description>It seems to me the whole of this thread has been derailed. Instead of discussing the people who are mentioned in the article it has ended up as a discussion of the views of Judy. I started to skim read very early in this thread of rants.
I have been photographing demonstrations over the last few years and so often I see Peter Tatchell. Not sitting by a keyboard but being there. I am sure there are  things I might disagree with him on but I have immense respect for him. He walks the talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me the whole of this thread has been derailed. Instead of discussing the people who are mentioned in the article it has ended up as a discussion of the views of Judy. I started to skim read very early in this thread of rants.<br />
I have been photographing demonstrations over the last few years and so often I see Peter Tatchell. Not sitting by a keyboard but being there. I am sure there are  things I might disagree with him on but I have immense respect for him. He walks the talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vildechaye</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/11/01/defend-peter-tatchell/comment-page-3/#comment-404070</link>
		<dc:creator>vildechaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=23518#comment-404070</guid>
		<description>RE: everyone doing research in cultural studies and questioning gender dichtomomy as complete nutters (as done in several commentaries) a bit unsavoury?

Cultural studies and its variants -- structuralism, post-structuralism, neo-structuralism, discourse theory, contextural analysis, etc etc ad nauseam -- are a virus on academe. Just look at some of the &quot;written&quot; work, which is incomprehensible and was so well exposed by the hoaxing engineer who wrote an entire essay about nothing that made it into a &quot;respected&quot; &quot;academic&quot; journal. In addition, it could be -- and has been -- argued that cultural studies et al are one of the primary causes of the cultural relativism that has so badly infected what used to be the progressive left. So no i don&#039;t find it unsavoury, rather, i find it long overdue and highly necessary. The bonus is that it&#039;s also really funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: everyone doing research in cultural studies and questioning gender dichtomomy as complete nutters (as done in several commentaries) a bit unsavoury?</p>
<p>Cultural studies and its variants &#8212; structuralism, post-structuralism, neo-structuralism, discourse theory, contextural analysis, etc etc ad nauseam &#8212; are a virus on academe. Just look at some of the &#8220;written&#8221; work, which is incomprehensible and was so well exposed by the hoaxing engineer who wrote an entire essay about nothing that made it into a &#8220;respected&#8221; &#8220;academic&#8221; journal. In addition, it could be &#8212; and has been &#8212; argued that cultural studies et al are one of the primary causes of the cultural relativism that has so badly infected what used to be the progressive left. So no i don&#8217;t find it unsavoury, rather, i find it long overdue and highly necessary. The bonus is that it&#8217;s also really funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

