<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polanski</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:44:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393591</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393591</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There’s nothing hypocritical about it. But you wouldn’t know that because you don’t know the details of the case.&lt;/i&gt;

No I hold to my point that there is a great deal of hypocrisy. Joshua on this thread proves that. It&#039;s okay to allow pedophilia to go on as long as you&#039;ve been in the Israeli army apparently. 

&lt;i&gt;You’re whole time here you’ve been trying to minimize what Polanski did and failed to see that those you compare him with didn’t commit the same crimes.&lt;/i&gt;

My &quot;whole time&quot; was making a point about hypocrisy. The fact that I hadn&#039;t looked at the case closely and am not fanatic rather proves your childish assertion, that anyone who makes a wider point is &quot;blatantly defending him&quot;, to be wrong. 

This tactic doesn&#039;t intimidate me pal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There’s nothing hypocritical about it. But you wouldn’t know that because you don’t know the details of the case.</i></p>
<p>No I hold to my point that there is a great deal of hypocrisy. Joshua on this thread proves that. It&#8217;s okay to allow pedophilia to go on as long as you&#8217;ve been in the Israeli army apparently. </p>
<p><i>You’re whole time here you’ve been trying to minimize what Polanski did and failed to see that those you compare him with didn’t commit the same crimes.</i></p>
<p>My &#8220;whole time&#8221; was making a point about hypocrisy. The fact that I hadn&#8217;t looked at the case closely and am not fanatic rather proves your childish assertion, that anyone who makes a wider point is &#8220;blatantly defending him&#8221;, to be wrong. </p>
<p>This tactic doesn&#8217;t intimidate me pal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mullah</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393589</link>
		<dc:creator>mullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393589</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My points were about the hypocrisy. &lt;/i&gt;

There&#039;s nothing hypocritical about it. But you wouldn&#039;t know that because you don&#039;t know the details of the case.

&lt;i&gt;It’s very likely that a set of popular celebs that you like from the period were caught up in sex parties with underaged kids. 

&lt;/i&gt;

This isn&#039;t all that Polanski did and you would know that if you bothered to look at the case.

You&#039;re whole time here you&#039;ve been trying to minimize what Polanski did and failed to see that those you compare him with didn&#039;t commit the same crimes.

&lt;i&gt;What’s a mickey?

&lt;/i&gt;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_Finn_(drugs)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My points were about the hypocrisy. </i></p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing hypocritical about it. But you wouldn&#8217;t know that because you don&#8217;t know the details of the case.</p>
<p><i>It’s very likely that a set of popular celebs that you like from the period were caught up in sex parties with underaged kids. </p>
<p></i></p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t all that Polanski did and you would know that if you bothered to look at the case.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re whole time here you&#8217;ve been trying to minimize what Polanski did and failed to see that those you compare him with didn&#8217;t commit the same crimes.</p>
<p><i>What’s a mickey?</p>
<p></i></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_Finn_(drugs)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_Finn_(drugs)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393585</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393585</guid>
		<description>Joshua, you should hang your head in shame for trying to smear the now dead girl who cannot defend herself. You may wonder what experiences she went through that made her into a drug addict in the first place. 

It&#039;s wrong to allow your mates to rape your daughter, whatever you have done else where in your life. You should come clean and face up to this fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua, you should hang your head in shame for trying to smear the now dead girl who cannot defend herself. You may wonder what experiences she went through that made her into a drug addict in the first place. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s wrong to allow your mates to rape your daughter, whatever you have done else where in your life. You should come clean and face up to this fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393584</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393584</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You haven’t cited any idols of mine.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s very likely that a set of popular celebs that you like from the period were caught up in sex parties with underaged kids. 

&lt;i&gt;You are simply saying that I have condemned Polanski for drugging and raping a girl, which I have, and then said I am hypocritical for not condemning my idols for the same crime.&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re the person who addressed me in the first place.  

&lt;i&gt;You’ve blatantly defended him. I didn’t need to pretend a thing.&lt;/i&gt;

Where? My points were about the hypocrisy. You obviously got the wrong end of the stick. I thought you were just baiting me so I refused to rise to it by having to point out the obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You haven’t cited any idols of mine.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s very likely that a set of popular celebs that you like from the period were caught up in sex parties with underaged kids. </p>
<p><i>You are simply saying that I have condemned Polanski for drugging and raping a girl, which I have, and then said I am hypocritical for not condemning my idols for the same crime.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re the person who addressed me in the first place.  </p>
<p><i>You’ve blatantly defended him. I didn’t need to pretend a thing.</i></p>
<p>Where? My points were about the hypocrisy. You obviously got the wrong end of the stick. I thought you were just baiting me so I refused to rise to it by having to point out the obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mullah</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393581</link>
		<dc:creator>mullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393581</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Where I’ve already given a few examples. You’re very naive. &lt;/i&gt;

You haven&#039;t cited any idols of mine. 

&lt;i&gt;But what straw man are you talking about?&lt;/i&gt;

You are simply saying that I have condemned Polanski for drugging and raping a girl, which I have, and then said I am hypocritical for not condemning &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; idols for &lt;i&gt;the same crime&lt;/i&gt;.

&lt;i&gt;You only get to this position by pretending I’m the guy who is defending Roman Polanki.
&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;ve blatantly defended him. I didn&#039;t need to pretend a thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Where I’ve already given a few examples. You’re very naive. </i></p>
<p>You haven&#8217;t cited any idols of mine. </p>
<p><i>But what straw man are you talking about?</i></p>
<p>You are simply saying that I have condemned Polanski for drugging and raping a girl, which I have, and then said I am hypocritical for not condemning <i>my</i> idols for <i>the same crime</i>.</p>
<p><i>You only get to this position by pretending I’m the guy who is defending Roman Polanki.<br />
</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve blatantly defended him. I didn&#8217;t need to pretend a thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wisteria</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393555</link>
		<dc:creator>wisteria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393555</guid>
		<description>Mike: Maybe. Or maybe he was just very unlucky. That’s why I’m saying its hypocritical.

The only party &#039;unlucky&#039; in this crime was his victim. But yes, the hypocrisy in seeing his premeditated, brutal, licentious criminal act being defended, or excused by anyone is unimaginable, but a sad reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: Maybe. Or maybe he was just very unlucky. That’s why I’m saying its hypocritical.</p>
<p>The only party &#8216;unlucky&#8217; in this crime was his victim. But yes, the hypocrisy in seeing his premeditated, brutal, licentious criminal act being defended, or excused by anyone is unimaginable, but a sad reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393542</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393542</guid>
		<description>1) &quot;I didn’t see you ask for evidence&quot;

I wrote above:

&quot;Can you provide some evidence? If it isn’t true, such a claim is grossly defamatory.&quot;

2) &quot;You’re obviously a big fan of Vidal Sasson&quot;

As he was a leading member of the 43 Group, fought in Israel&#039;s War of Independence and has done much for charity, yes, I rather do like Mr. Sassoon. However, even if I had not been a fan, I would still have despised your yellow journalism and would have complained.

Let me introduce you to reality:

1) If such allegations had been made, even if not true, they would have been explosive and would be common currency. How come such currency is non-existent, or at least extremely difficult to find?

2) The daughter in question, a drug addict, was a highly disturbed person who actually left home when she was 14 and married at 15. She put her father through hell. Despite all this, Vidal Sassoon was most devoted to her and, especially given the circumstances, immensely generous to her. It is inconceivable to me that he would at any time have put her in any kind of danger.

3) I believe that Vidal should have a chance to defend himself against your allegations. However, let us suppose for a moment that his daughter did make these allegations, this does not mean that they were true, and yet you have accepted them at face value. You have acted as judge, jury and, in trashing his reputation like this, you have also taken it upon yourself to be his exectioner. Such behaviour is utterly despicable. I know you won&#039;t, but you should hang your head in shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) &#8220;I didn’t see you ask for evidence&#8221;</p>
<p>I wrote above:</p>
<p>&#8220;Can you provide some evidence? If it isn’t true, such a claim is grossly defamatory.&#8221;</p>
<p>2) &#8220;You’re obviously a big fan of Vidal Sasson&#8221;</p>
<p>As he was a leading member of the 43 Group, fought in Israel&#8217;s War of Independence and has done much for charity, yes, I rather do like Mr. Sassoon. However, even if I had not been a fan, I would still have despised your yellow journalism and would have complained.</p>
<p>Let me introduce you to reality:</p>
<p>1) If such allegations had been made, even if not true, they would have been explosive and would be common currency. How come such currency is non-existent, or at least extremely difficult to find?</p>
<p>2) The daughter in question, a drug addict, was a highly disturbed person who actually left home when she was 14 and married at 15. She put her father through hell. Despite all this, Vidal Sassoon was most devoted to her and, especially given the circumstances, immensely generous to her. It is inconceivable to me that he would at any time have put her in any kind of danger.</p>
<p>3) I believe that Vidal should have a chance to defend himself against your allegations. However, let us suppose for a moment that his daughter did make these allegations, this does not mean that they were true, and yet you have accepted them at face value. You have acted as judge, jury and, in trashing his reputation like this, you have also taken it upon yourself to be his exectioner. Such behaviour is utterly despicable. I know you won&#8217;t, but you should hang your head in shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark ramsden</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393427</link>
		<dc:creator>mark ramsden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393427</guid>
		<description>At his age? That&#039;s about 500 in gay years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At his age? That&#8217;s about 500 in gay years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rombo2571</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393420</link>
		<dc:creator>Rombo2571</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393420</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Mr Polanski should be sodomised?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Mr Polanski should be sodomised?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark ramsden</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/09/28/polanski/comment-page-4/#comment-393416</link>
		<dc:creator>mark ramsden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=22148#comment-393416</guid>
		<description>&quot;isn’t old Roman a bit overated as a director anyway?&quot;

Well, apart from the universally acclaimed Noir classic Chinatown, edgy art masterpieces like Repulsion, winning an Oscar The Pianist and successful genre work in everything from shlock horror to Dickens: what has the Roman ever done for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;isn’t old Roman a bit overated as a director anyway?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, apart from the universally acclaimed Noir classic Chinatown, edgy art masterpieces like Repulsion, winning an Oscar The Pianist and successful genre work in everything from shlock horror to Dickens: what has the Roman ever done for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

