Would it for example cover someone who supports equal marriage?

Would it cover someone who supports services in mosques being in English instead of Arabic?

I am also unclear about the argument that Muslims should be treated like any other ‘immigrants’. Most Muslims in Scotland are not immigrants, so why should they be treated as immigrants?

Why, I myself have two Proclaimers tracks in my iTunes collection

(“Whalliknoo” and “The other one”)

Really? Name ‘em.

Maybe in your “guilty white liberal” viewpoint, we can’t criticise ANYTHING that ANY muslim does, but the rest of us (including many muslims, I might add) have serious concerns about Osama Saeed.

The whole thing stinks. A SNP candidate who has worked with Alex Salmond, setting up an Islamic group after the SNP was elected which seemed designed simply to received taxpayers funds from said Salmond/SNP.

The other concern is that Osama Saeed doesn’t even seem moderate at all. (and who in the muslim community elected him to speak on their behalf? Who says his form of Islamism is representative?)

The whole thing stinks. The SNP could regret this. If they don’t stop funding this individual then it will cost them at the ballot box. People aren’t as stupid as they seem to think.

Please, please, please, keep digging. I’m willing to bet there’s plenty more cause for concern in Osama Saeed’s history/views.

Sorry I don’t have the link.

Dear pointless troll, look at my moniker. If you were on my side you might have had at least a smidgen of feeling for the people of Kosova as they were terrorized by Sloba’s socialist kleptocracy, or the people of Afghanistan or Darfur. You might think that Muslims like Khalid or Naim Ternava have a point when they see people using their religion to further their own sordid ends. But all you see is ‘resistance’ (or, were I to take you at face value, hatred of Muslims) and all you do is make silly pronouncements with the intent of furthering the cause of whichever group of thugs and murderers you’re backing this week.