It doesn’t wash with Julai M because she is always diving in to rescue neo-Nazi types and bigots, an alarming pattern indeed and seriously, not all ideas or opinions are equal, shutting down a small part of the Internet that pukes hatred is all good.

I tell it simpler – I simply cite Godwin’s Law and the apparent inability of many on this site to argue reasonably without playing the Nazi/anti-Semite card.

I wonder why?

Go figure, JuliaM.

Assumption again? It seems you are just as guilty of that as you claim I am…

“Now try answering my question, at the third time of asking.”

I would do so were I the blog host, yes. Why they haven’t, I can’t say. That’s down to them.

Now try answering my question, at the third time of asking.

In your experience Julia, when a blog is hacked, do the owners normally start a new blog with a different name?

Or do they contact their host to get the damage reversed, passwords changed etc?

Why should I care whether they did or not? That’s a matter fr them, and for Blogger. No one else.

The issue of whether they broke their TOS certainly doesn’t concern me as much as the other issues around this blog.

“What are you smoking?”

I don’t smoke. I never took it up, just as I never took up self-defeating stunts on the Internet…

Who has got reading comprehension problems now?

I didn’t make any assumptions, just OBSERVED your indifference towards the issue of whether they broke their TOS, as compared with your fervent conviction, (based on zero evidence), that Edmund Standing did a naughty.

“So, if a blog gets taken off the net because it breaks its TOS, it makes sense to give the name to someone else so they can then be mistaken for the notorious blog? What the hell are you smoking!”

In your experience Julia, when a blog is hacked, do the owners normally start a new blog with a different name?

Or do they contact their host to get the damage reversed, passwords changed etc?

What are you smoking?