<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Centre for Social Cohesion BNP Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:02:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-374658</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-374658</guid>
		<description>If you believe in democracy as the only real means of running a country, and you examine the track record of the LibLabCon people over the last 10 years, you cannot help but come to the conclusion that the only party worth voting for in any election is the BNP.  If we don&#039;t, the country will continue to slide towards islamification and 3rd world status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe in democracy as the only real means of running a country, and you examine the track record of the LibLabCon people over the last 10 years, you cannot help but come to the conclusion that the only party worth voting for in any election is the BNP.  If we don&#8217;t, the country will continue to slide towards islamification and 3rd world status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemesis6</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-368175</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemesis6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-368175</guid>
		<description>The BNP can be called racist, xenophobic, fascist, and so on, but I like to apply the umbrella term &#039;fucktards&#039; to them. Other than the support of the small minority of the public that can&#039;t see through their facade, they have political legitimacy only in their own, deluded little world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BNP can be called racist, xenophobic, fascist, and so on, but I like to apply the umbrella term &#8216;fucktards&#8217; to them. Other than the support of the small minority of the public that can&#8217;t see through their facade, they have political legitimacy only in their own, deluded little world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmund Standing</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-367323</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmund Standing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-367323</guid>
		<description>Allan@Aberdeen, go back to the BNP site, where &lt;a href=&quot;http://bnp.org.uk/2008/07/red-white-and-blue-coming-of-age-a-year-early/#IDComment13830919&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you write&lt;/a&gt; that you&#039;re &#039;quite a reasonable donor&#039; to the BNP and ask if you can go to the Red, White &amp; Blue festival. I&#039;m not interested in talking to you. 

Why not head over to Covert Undercover Nuisance Tactics and talk to some fellow RWB attendees there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan@Aberdeen, go back to the BNP site, where <a href="http://bnp.org.uk/2008/07/red-white-and-blue-coming-of-age-a-year-early/#IDComment13830919" rel="nofollow">you write</a> that you&#8217;re &#8216;quite a reasonable donor&#8217; to the BNP and ask if you can go to the Red, White &amp; Blue festival. I&#8217;m not interested in talking to you. </p>
<p>Why not head over to Covert Undercover Nuisance Tactics and talk to some fellow RWB attendees there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left-Liberal Hawk</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-367066</link>
		<dc:creator>Left-Liberal Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-367066</guid>
		<description>This is a leftwing site mate, not sure what you&#039;re doing here.  Why dont you log off and put TalkSport on. 

For the record, I am no pacifist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a leftwing site mate, not sure what you&#8217;re doing here.  Why dont you log off and put TalkSport on. </p>
<p>For the record, I am no pacifist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British not Racist</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-367055</link>
		<dc:creator>British not Racist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-367055</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s no point arguing with you chaps, especially &quot;internationalists&quot; who seek to warp human nature &amp; create a wonderful peaceful unified planet with world government &amp; probably &quot;no religion too&quot;. Darwin would identify pacifists &amp; internationalists as suicidally endangered species.

I was merely pointing out that most people who vote BNP do so in ignorance of the party&#039;s hidden agenda.  If white Christians had the power in Muslim countries that Asian Muslims exert in ours I might be able to argue with 
the respectable middle class BNP supporters that I have met in the recent
past.  As it is, non Muslims of all colours feel that Muslims have too much
of everything that the Welfare State hands out &amp; white Brits are sick of 
politicians hanging around 90% non white immigrant schools, as if they are typical.  Do you think Brown will send his kids to a school where the girls wear headscarves ?
Ask Diane Abbott why she did not send her son to any local comprehensives
&amp; instead sent him to an independent school .
It is condescending to immigrants to treat them like this &amp; it is dangerous for social cohesion to encourage Islamic practices &amp; morals in a Western Country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s no point arguing with you chaps, especially &#8220;internationalists&#8221; who seek to warp human nature &amp; create a wonderful peaceful unified planet with world government &amp; probably &#8220;no religion too&#8221;. Darwin would identify pacifists &amp; internationalists as suicidally endangered species.</p>
<p>I was merely pointing out that most people who vote BNP do so in ignorance of the party&#8217;s hidden agenda.  If white Christians had the power in Muslim countries that Asian Muslims exert in ours I might be able to argue with<br />
the respectable middle class BNP supporters that I have met in the recent<br />
past.  As it is, non Muslims of all colours feel that Muslims have too much<br />
of everything that the Welfare State hands out &amp; white Brits are sick of<br />
politicians hanging around 90% non white immigrant schools, as if they are typical.  Do you think Brown will send his kids to a school where the girls wear headscarves ?<br />
Ask Diane Abbott why she did not send her son to any local comprehensives<br />
&amp; instead sent him to an independent school .<br />
It is condescending to immigrants to treat them like this &amp; it is dangerous for social cohesion to encourage Islamic practices &amp; morals in a Western Country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-367053</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-367053</guid>
		<description>A timely and important report. Well done to the CSC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A timely and important report. Well done to the CSC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hasan prishtina</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-367049</link>
		<dc:creator>hasan prishtina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-367049</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No PM from Attlee to MacMillan [sic] could imagine immigration of the scale &amp; nature we have experienced.&lt;/i&gt;

You forget that 1) immigration reached an unprecedented peak during Macmillan&#039;s tenure of office, of 136,400 in 1961 alone; 2) Harold Macmillan died in 1986, some time after most of the immigration from the &#039;New Commonwealth&#039; had dried up, and was an active member of the House of Lords until shortly before his death; 3) He said nothing of about the scale and nature of immigration being unimaginable; in fact, he seemed very able to imagine it. Anthony Eden died in 1977; though not as active in the Lords, points 2) and 3) still apply.  

&lt;i&gt;Most Muslims have arrived in the last 25 years.&lt;/i&gt;

I am surprised, then, that you have access to the internet, as you seem to be living some time in the late 1970s or early 1980s. Most Muslims in Britain are of Pakistani or Bangladeshi origin and arrived in the UK between the mid-50s and the mid-70s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No PM from Attlee to MacMillan [sic] could imagine immigration of the scale &amp; nature we have experienced.</i></p>
<p>You forget that 1) immigration reached an unprecedented peak during Macmillan&#8217;s tenure of office, of 136,400 in 1961 alone; 2) Harold Macmillan died in 1986, some time after most of the immigration from the &#8216;New Commonwealth&#8217; had dried up, and was an active member of the House of Lords until shortly before his death; 3) He said nothing of about the scale and nature of immigration being unimaginable; in fact, he seemed very able to imagine it. Anthony Eden died in 1977; though not as active in the Lords, points 2) and 3) still apply.  </p>
<p><i>Most Muslims have arrived in the last 25 years.</i></p>
<p>I am surprised, then, that you have access to the internet, as you seem to be living some time in the late 1970s or early 1980s. Most Muslims in Britain are of Pakistani or Bangladeshi origin and arrived in the UK between the mid-50s and the mid-70s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left-Liberal Hawk</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-367044</link>
		<dc:creator>Left-Liberal Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-367044</guid>
		<description>Your facts and figures sound like crap - you&#039;re saying 1984 was when the &quot;muslim floodgates&quot; were opened!  I thought Pakistanis arrived in the 50s and 60s and Bengalis in the 70s?

Bomb plots and islamic oppression of women is a global problem which should be fought on a global basis - its not a probabam caused by immigration and immigration / repatriation policies would at &quot;best&quot; only move the problem.  How petty and small minded to think jihadist violence is something that can be dealt with by immigration controls or reptatriation - how would this prevent islamist bombs in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Israel, the middle east, Turkey, Africa?

I&#039;m not sure what your  claims about social housing and council spending are meant to show - even if true.

I&#039;m a univeralist and an internationist - much more true to the values of the enlightenment than the Islamists or right wing reactionaries like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your facts and figures sound like crap &#8211; you&#8217;re saying 1984 was when the &#8220;muslim floodgates&#8221; were opened!  I thought Pakistanis arrived in the 50s and 60s and Bengalis in the 70s?</p>
<p>Bomb plots and islamic oppression of women is a global problem which should be fought on a global basis &#8211; its not a probabam caused by immigration and immigration / repatriation policies would at &#8220;best&#8221; only move the problem.  How petty and small minded to think jihadist violence is something that can be dealt with by immigration controls or reptatriation &#8211; how would this prevent islamist bombs in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Israel, the middle east, Turkey, Africa?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what your  claims about social housing and council spending are meant to show &#8211; even if true.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a univeralist and an internationist &#8211; much more true to the values of the enlightenment than the Islamists or right wing reactionaries like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British not Racist</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-367042</link>
		<dc:creator>British not Racist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-367042</guid>
		<description>Left Liberal Hawk

For a start birdbrain, the PMs were in office from the early 1940s (when there were 8,000 black British residents) to 1963. Muslims were notable by their absence &amp; most immigrants were Caribbean Christians &amp; assorted refugees from Europe
Most Muslims have arrived in the last 25 years.

Read the latest Private Eye for starters.  In 30% muslim Tower Hamlets 
ONE BILLION POUNDS of our money is spent annually according to the Bangladeshi village from which heads of extended families emanate.

If you think women wearing mobile prisons, bomb plots, 80% of muslims living in social housing, hundreds of millions of untaxed money going back to muslim villages in Asia is good, then you&#039;re not a Westerner, let alone British.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Left Liberal Hawk</p>
<p>For a start birdbrain, the PMs were in office from the early 1940s (when there were 8,000 black British residents) to 1963. Muslims were notable by their absence &amp; most immigrants were Caribbean Christians &amp; assorted refugees from Europe<br />
Most Muslims have arrived in the last 25 years.</p>
<p>Read the latest Private Eye for starters.  In 30% muslim Tower Hamlets<br />
ONE BILLION POUNDS of our money is spent annually according to the Bangladeshi village from which heads of extended families emanate.</p>
<p>If you think women wearing mobile prisons, bomb plots, 80% of muslims living in social housing, hundreds of millions of untaxed money going back to muslim villages in Asia is good, then you&#8217;re not a Westerner, let alone British.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left-Liberal Hawk</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/comment-page-1/#comment-367040</link>
		<dc:creator>Left-Liberal Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=19272#comment-367040</guid>
		<description>&quot;No PM from Attlee to MacMillan could imagine immigration of the scale &amp; nature we have experienced.&quot;

What is the scale and nature of immigration which is so different to that in the 50s and 60s and what is so problematic about it?  Most Muslims - the group which you are clearly concerned with - living in Britain are from the Pakistani or Bangladeshi communities.  These communities have been here for decades and decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No PM from Attlee to MacMillan could imagine immigration of the scale &amp; nature we have experienced.&#8221;</p>
<p>What is the scale and nature of immigration which is so different to that in the 50s and 60s and what is so problematic about it?  Most Muslims &#8211; the group which you are clearly concerned with &#8211; living in Britain are from the Pakistani or Bangladeshi communities.  These communities have been here for decades and decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
