<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet More Sean Wallis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-354089</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-354089</guid>
		<description>&quot;publishing his email address on this website is effectively encouraging people to harass him, by the way&quot;

Crap. You can find his email address on the UCL website. That&#039;s what I did. Now, fuck off, Sean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;publishing his email address on this website is effectively encouraging people to harass him, by the way&#8221;</p>
<p>Crap. You can find his email address on the UCL website. That&#8217;s what I did. Now, fuck off, Sean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vildechaye</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-354050</link>
		<dc:creator>vildechaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-354050</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am very clear about what does and does not constitute evidence of motive in bullying cases. Failure to cease when asked to do so is constitutive of evidence of intent.”

I don&#039;t live in Britain and so don&#039;t know how the SWP operates. But if they&#039;re anything like the extreme left clowns here in Canada, they routinely &quot;fail to cease when asked to do so,&quot; and one might say that the SWP-UCU leadership is bullying its own union, as it fails to cease pushing this doomed boycott effort despite being asked -- and legally advised -- to do so. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! What chutzpah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am very clear about what does and does not constitute evidence of motive in bullying cases. Failure to cease when asked to do so is constitutive of evidence of intent.”</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t live in Britain and so don&#8217;t know how the SWP operates. But if they&#8217;re anything like the extreme left clowns here in Canada, they routinely &#8220;fail to cease when asked to do so,&#8221; and one might say that the SWP-UCU leadership is bullying its own union, as it fails to cease pushing this doomed boycott effort despite being asked &#8212; and legally advised &#8212; to do so. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! What chutzpah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabián from Israel</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-354013</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabián from Israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-354013</guid>
		<description>&quot;and concern about the welfare of individuals if such a stall were to be there”.”

Why? Do some Arabs plan to murder the Jews at the stall, and UNISON doesn&#039;t want to be seen applauding from the side?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and concern about the welfare of individuals if such a stall were to be there”.”</p>
<p>Why? Do some Arabs plan to murder the Jews at the stall, and UNISON doesn&#8217;t want to be seen applauding from the side?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabián from Israel</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-354012</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabián from Israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-354012</guid>
		<description>&quot;And I am not talking about Zionists, I am talking about rich Zionists.&quot;

&quot;Sorry, I am not talking about rich Zionists, I am talking about rich Zionists with evil designs.&quot;

Etc, etc, ad NAUSEAM!

Because nausea is what people like Wright and Wight produce in me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And I am not talking about Zionists, I am talking about rich Zionists.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Sorry, I am not talking about rich Zionists, I am talking about rich Zionists with evil designs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Etc, etc, ad NAUSEAM!</p>
<p>Because nausea is what people like Wright and Wight produce in me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne T</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-354004</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-354004</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bill Gilby, the union’s conference organiser, said he would not describe Tufi’s absence as “a ban”. He said his conference team had received “an expression of concern” at the possibility of Tufi being offered a stall, “because of the union’s long-standing policy position on the Middle East and concern about the welfare of individuals if such a stall were to be there”.&quot;

Is Gilby suggesting that Unison has no reasonable security responsiblities when they put on an annual conference? Who are they opening attendance up to -- biker gangs?

It strikes me that at least two Israeli Arabs have stated publicly that the pro-boycott sentiment is a manufactured one that doesn&#039;t even exist in the West Bank, Gaza or Israel.

One is the Israeli consul general to California + Pacific NW, Ismail Khaldi speaking against Israel Apartheid Week earlier this year and the other, journalist Khalid Abu Toameh, more recently, at a conference about tolerance and the Islamic world held at the Palais des Nations during the Durban Review Conference:

KAT:
Now as I said, for the past eight years I have been working for The Jerusalem Post and one of the questions that people often ask me is, “why are you working for a Jewish paper?  Aren&#039;t you seen as a traitor because you work for a Jewish paper?”  I tell people “absolutely not.”

There has never been a decision by the Palestinians to boycott the Israeli media.  The only talk about boycott comes from American and British university campuses. 

Take time to read his entire address: http://www.hudsonny.org/2009/05/islam-today-1.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bill Gilby, the union’s conference organiser, said he would not describe Tufi’s absence as “a ban”. He said his conference team had received “an expression of concern” at the possibility of Tufi being offered a stall, “because of the union’s long-standing policy position on the Middle East and concern about the welfare of individuals if such a stall were to be there”.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is Gilby suggesting that Unison has no reasonable security responsiblities when they put on an annual conference? Who are they opening attendance up to &#8212; biker gangs?</p>
<p>It strikes me that at least two Israeli Arabs have stated publicly that the pro-boycott sentiment is a manufactured one that doesn&#8217;t even exist in the West Bank, Gaza or Israel.</p>
<p>One is the Israeli consul general to California + Pacific NW, Ismail Khaldi speaking against Israel Apartheid Week earlier this year and the other, journalist Khalid Abu Toameh, more recently, at a conference about tolerance and the Islamic world held at the Palais des Nations during the Durban Review Conference:</p>
<p>KAT:<br />
Now as I said, for the past eight years I have been working for The Jerusalem Post and one of the questions that people often ask me is, “why are you working for a Jewish paper?  Aren&#8217;t you seen as a traitor because you work for a Jewish paper?”  I tell people “absolutely not.”</p>
<p>There has never been a decision by the Palestinians to boycott the Israeli media.  The only talk about boycott comes from American and British university campuses. </p>
<p>Take time to read his entire address: <a href="http://www.hudsonny.org/2009/05/islam-today-1.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.hudsonny.org/2009/05/islam-today-1.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-353950</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-353950</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Jews” - “Zionists” - a mere slip of the tongue obviously&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He meant Jews.  And any Jews, Zionist or otherwise would do.  Otherwise he would have said Zionist in the first place -- unless he can&#039;t be bothered to tell them apart.

Jerry and Sean can sleep in the doghouse with Letterman, who effectively did the same thing, tonight (and, no, I&#039;m not a Palin).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Jews” &#8211; “Zionists” &#8211; a mere slip of the tongue obviously</p></blockquote>
<p>He meant Jews.  And any Jews, Zionist or otherwise would do.  Otherwise he would have said Zionist in the first place &#8212; unless he can&#8217;t be bothered to tell them apart.</p>
<p>Jerry and Sean can sleep in the doghouse with Letterman, who effectively did the same thing, tonight (and, no, I&#8217;m not a Palin).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mettaculture</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-353946</link>
		<dc:creator>mettaculture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-353946</guid>
		<description>&#039;I have to find that the failure to put the allegation to me given the opportunity to do so is evidence of motive 

-that this was not an act of reportage but a deliberate attempt to discredit me personally by people with an ulterior motive - to discredit the UCU by association.

This motive is pretty explicit in the allegations reported in the

Jerusalem Post, see http://tinyurl.com/ponmnn .

..........................

.....is a smokescreen for the fact that your colleague(s) did not put the allegation to me at the time. ..................

Fortunately for me, I am well-known. My members attest to my character. No-one who knows me thinks there is any merit in the allegation. .........

 Colleagues on the activist list have commented privately that they feel that this is an attempt to deliberately intimidate them into not speaking out...............

Uh huh Mr anti-Zionist of unimpeachable charater (as his friends and colleagues will attest to) is being accused of antisemitism by those with a motive to discredit him as an anti-semite as reported in the Jerusalem Post.

Further more this accusation is clearly a smokescreen and an other or other persons are involved (colleagu(s)) in what privately other colleagues of Sean Wallis on the UCU activist list (who are planning to introduce an illegal boycott of Israel and Israelis) believe this is an attempt to deliberately intimidate them into not speaking out [about the illegal anti-Israeli policy they wish against legal advice to pursue].

OK Sean Wallis you believe someone or some people are out to discredit you (as reported in the Jerusalem Post) a campaign of intimidation.

I wonder who you think who they might be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I have to find that the failure to put the allegation to me given the opportunity to do so is evidence of motive </p>
<p>-that this was not an act of reportage but a deliberate attempt to discredit me personally by people with an ulterior motive &#8211; to discredit the UCU by association.</p>
<p>This motive is pretty explicit in the allegations reported in the</p>
<p>Jerusalem Post, see <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ponmnn" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ponmnn</a> .</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8230;..is a smokescreen for the fact that your colleague(s) did not put the allegation to me at the time. &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Fortunately for me, I am well-known. My members attest to my character. No-one who knows me thinks there is any merit in the allegation. &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p> Colleagues on the activist list have commented privately that they feel that this is an attempt to deliberately intimidate them into not speaking out&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Uh huh Mr anti-Zionist of unimpeachable charater (as his friends and colleagues will attest to) is being accused of antisemitism by those with a motive to discredit him as an anti-semite as reported in the Jerusalem Post.</p>
<p>Further more this accusation is clearly a smokescreen and an other or other persons are involved (colleagu(s)) in what privately other colleagues of Sean Wallis on the UCU activist list (who are planning to introduce an illegal boycott of Israel and Israelis) believe this is an attempt to deliberately intimidate them into not speaking out [about the illegal anti-Israeli policy they wish against legal advice to pursue].</p>
<p>OK Sean Wallis you believe someone or some people are out to discredit you (as reported in the Jerusalem Post) a campaign of intimidation.</p>
<p>I wonder who you think who they might be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoreMediaNonsense</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-353918</link>
		<dc:creator>MoreMediaNonsense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-353918</guid>
		<description>This guy is almost as stupid as Jeremiah Wright :

&lt;i&gt;Rev. Wright: I Meant to Say “Zionists” Are Keeping Me from Talking to President Obama -- Not Jews

“Let me say like Hillary, I misspoke,” Wright said. “Let me just say: Zionists.”  

Wright said “I’m not talking about all Jews, all people of the Jewish faith, I’m talking about Zionists.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/06/rev-wright-i-meant-to-say-zionists-are-keeping-me-from-talking-to-president-obama-not-jews.html

&quot;Jews&quot; - &quot;Zionists&quot; - a mere slip of the tongue obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy is almost as stupid as Jeremiah Wright :</p>
<p><i>Rev. Wright: I Meant to Say “Zionists” Are Keeping Me from Talking to President Obama &#8212; Not Jews</p>
<p>“Let me say like Hillary, I misspoke,” Wright said. “Let me just say: Zionists.”  </p>
<p>Wright said “I’m not talking about all Jews, all people of the Jewish faith, I’m talking about Zionists.&#8221;</i></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/06/rev-wright-i-meant-to-say-zionists-are-keeping-me-from-talking-to-president-obama-not-jews.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/06/rev-wright-i-meant-to-say-zionists-are-keeping-me-from-talking-to-president-obama-not-jews.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Jews&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;Zionists&#8221; &#8211; a mere slip of the tongue obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-353913</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-353913</guid>
		<description>Lucy Lips, in my opinion, has correctly accused Sean Wallis of being a &quot;revolting man.&quot; We can go further, the SWP, is a revolting party and its members are nasty and revolting. A pleasant person and a SWP member is an oxymoron. The United Kingdom will be a better place when the SWP and the BNP are completely smashed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucy Lips, in my opinion, has correctly accused Sean Wallis of being a &#8220;revolting man.&#8221; We can go further, the SWP, is a revolting party and its members are nasty and revolting. A pleasant person and a SWP member is an oxymoron. The United Kingdom will be a better place when the SWP and the BNP are completely smashed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix (Italy)</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2009/06/12/yet-more-sean-wallis/comment-page-1/#comment-353898</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix (Italy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/?p=17849#comment-353898</guid>
		<description>Instead of writing a long letter about being misquoted, why doesn&#039;t Sean Wallis simply say what he really thinks? Long practise in the art of lying?

I look at the &#039; aesthetic&#039; sense and texture of prose. There isn&#039;t a glimmer of humanity in his letter whereas there is in the comment that follows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of writing a long letter about being misquoted, why doesn&#8217;t Sean Wallis simply say what he really thinks? Long practise in the art of lying?</p>
<p>I look at the &#8216; aesthetic&#8217; sense and texture of prose. There isn&#8217;t a glimmer of humanity in his letter whereas there is in the comment that follows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

