Comments on: Sri Lanka triumphant in UN war crimes vote

By: Mango

Mango — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:47:09 +0000

Rockall, “…foreign-funded NGOs are ill-intentioned and hostile to the nation in which they operate.” is exactly correctly.

We’re beginning to see the LTTE-supporting NGOs’ secrets gradually spill out. They helped the LTTE with transport, money, heavy lift equipment, propaganda etc. Use Google, have you heard of it?

Here you go:
The Norwegian-funded NPA’s assistance to the LTTE.

..”When the Norwegian People’s Aid, a Norwegian Government funded NGO says its heavy earth moving vehicles, trucks & tractors have been “stolen” by the LTTE – those who know of NPA track record will immediately recall how NPA was party to the secret smuggling of arms to an insurgent group (Sudan’s People’s Liberation Army) in Sudan.

Viewing the massive bunkers that the army have taken over, the trenches that delay army advances it is very easy to assume that these trenches, bunkers etc could not have been built overnight – which immediately necessitates that if these vehicles etc were “stolen” it should not have taken till the army’s advancement to actually inform the Government. The soldiers who overran the Stanley Base and other camps found electricity generators, water pumps, tents, water dowsers belonging to INGOs (Media Centre for National Security).”
http://www.asiantribune.com/?q=node/13504

As for your pathetic 6th Form sub-Grauniad crack about bloodstained regimes, I refer you the recent UK/US disasters in Iraq & Afghanistan and before that, Madeline Albright’s famous remark about 50,000 dead Iraqi kids (or was it 500,000 ?) being a ‘price worth paying’ for sanctions against Iraq.

Sri Lanka has a long way to go before it gets anywhere near the Premiere League Western bloodstained regimes. Your NGO-tards are not “enemies of cruelty and oppression”. They aid and abet instigators “cruelty and oppression”. We now have documented proof that the many INGOs assisted the LTTE, who wrote the book on “cruelty and oppression” to maintain their ethnically pure statelet in Northern Sri Lanka.

If you support the LTTE, just come out and say it. This is after all an internet forum. The Western bloc can no longer use the human rights shtick (pun intended) to beat Sri Lanka’s admittedly very, very imperfect government.

By: David All

David All — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:55:19 +0000

Thank you, Mango for linking to indi’s honest, straight forward and eloquent assessment of what the brutal victory of the democratically elected Sri Lankan govt. over the ruthless terrorists of the LTTE has cost and why this victory, however destructive of civilian life, was necessary for Sri Lanka to have any hope of a decent future.

By: Shenonymous

Shenonymous — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:09:39 +0000

Questions: What exactly has the UN done to promote human progress in the world? What exact good has the Human Rights Commission done in its existence? What real effect does the HRC have on world affairs that violate human rights? What exactly are the consequences of the HRC’s conclusions? Seems there is no evidence that the UN has ever done anything constructive. Seems it is merely a forum for people of the various member countries to voice various rants and complaints. Hasn’t it been ineffective in preventing wars and HR violations? Can’t see that anything effective has been accomplished by the UN or by its HRC.

By: Rockall666

Rockall666 — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:58:39 +0000

SACKCLOTH – Rockall was in the war zone of Sri Lanka some years ago, close enough to hear but not see an ambush.

The reference to wog on wog crime was ironic. Geddit?

MANGO!
When the appointed or unappointed spokespersons of bloodstained regimes start yelling that foreign-funded NGOs are ill-intentioned and hostile to the nation in which they operate, distrust those spokespersons immediately.

We’ve now heard this stuff about Central America, Egypt, Kashmir, Gaza, Sarawak and Bosnia.

Sapheaded though the the NGOcrats might sometimes or often be, they are enemies of cruelty and oppression. That is all that need be said.

By: Mango

Mango — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:33:10 +0000

Here you go, info direct from Sri Lanka, from an avowedly anti-govt, but pro unitary SL blogger.

Please understand why neither The Times’s posturing nor histrionics at the UNHCR from Eelamtard-vote dependant Western bloc politicans & INGOs will change SL govt’s position.

http://indi.ca/2009/05/the-times-have-changed-london/

By: Maxd

Maxd — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:42:33 +0000

why doesnt anybody talk about the killings of millions of civilians by the US army in iraq,afghanistan and vietnam? are they pure war crimes? how you justify them?? The conflict in SL is completely different. LTTE is a well identified terrorist which is banned in more than 30 countries including some of those countries who voted against SL too. when SL government manages to wipe them off these so called anti terrorist nations vote against Sri lanka. Doesnt that bare proves their double acting? FBI reports say its one of the most dangerous terrorist groups founded ever! Who posses suiside bombers, heavy weaponary, navy power, and even an air force power!! can any of you people understand how critical the situation was? does alquida or hamas posses air crafts that bombs you people?? sri lankan conflict was and internal problem which was supported by millions of dollars from these so called anti terrorist nations.. how could we compare it with the israel-hamas confilict?f theres a cancer in your body what would you have to do? you will have to kill it off! but when you treat the cancer some of your own uninfected cells may also be killed. but if you didnt kill the cancer it will kill your whole body! what would be your solution? LTTE was a mortal cancer in the body of SL while israel and palastine conflict already are two bodies.. sri lankan government had to wipe off this ruthless terrorist group. And they did achieve it for the first time in world history. military measures were taken at a minimum harm for the civilians who were forced to become the human shields by the devil terrorists. it was a rescue operation which rescued 300000 civilians from the ruling of terrorists! in the mean time i hats off to israel for supporting the SL government with military aid since 1980s. when USA refused israel helped us with equipments.. its not fair to compare these 2 conflicts brothers..

By: David All

David All — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:35:08 +0000

It should be pointed out that the Tamil Tigers were responsable for thousands of the dead civilians either by killing them or by using them as Human shields against the Sri Lankan military.

By: Israelinurse

Israelinurse — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:31:08 +0000

‘the UN is in danger of losing all moral authority’
I would go even a little further back than David All and say that the UN lost any moral authority it might have had the day it allowed Yasser Arafat to walk into its NY building with a pistol in his holster.

By: Cipriano

Cipriano — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:15:25 +0000

I wonder what got that one into the moderation queue….

By: Cipriano

Cipriano — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:14:16 +0000

Having spent 20 years as a diplomat, I have maintained for a long time that the UN has no real value at all, being simply a talking shop for governments, very few of whom genuinely represent their people. The idea that all “countries” are equal, and that what “countries” think or say is in any way a valid representation of the interests of the peoples of the world, is simply ridiculous. No dictatorship has any other purpose except staying in power for as long as possible, and so of course they easily arrive at an alliance of interests – “Tyranny International” as I have always called it. The whole thing is worthless, and John Bolton was absolutely right to say so. Fortunately the few democratic states with a sense of responsibility don’t listen to them any more and never will again.