… on another point…. we Muslims don’t take very kindly to your definitions of moderates and so what. Why? Because Islaam taught us (1400 years ago, may I add) to take the middle path and that we Muslims are a nation which adhere to the middle course.
So don’t feel too disheartened when the so-called ‘moderates’ aren’t up in arms about these ‘extremists’ in their midst… it’s almost laughable.

I may have failed in keeping this short but my sentiments needed to be addressed for the sake of establishing truth.
Again, I warmly invite you to attend and lend an ear to these ‘extremists’ you speak of or be silent and reseve judgement. I see no logic in your rant.

May the Lord of the Worlds guide us all to what is correct.

No I don’t. I just don’t see what you can expect from a Muslim who is disinterested in these student societies and campus politics and simply wants to study and have a good time. Similarly, I don’t blame organised Christianity for fanatics like David Koresh.

The rest of your rant is your assumptions about me, rather than anything I’ve actually said. But please feel free to bullshit away.

And to judge from your logic, it’s the purvey of Methodists to rein in islamists.

One must never make demands on ordinary Muslims or, god forbid, ever assert they’ve certain duties and responsabilities vis a vis their co-religionists, the way we immediately would with (white) members of other faiths.

You give these assholes a pass for no other reason than the fact they’re non-white and non-Christian.

And that you are a coward.

Their pro-pos are far more grevious and inflamatory than anything Geert Wilders could come up with, but yet it was Geert you wanted to see beaten up at Heathrow.

Until you can summon the courage to take on Khalid Yasin with a similar gusto, you shall forever remain the very template for ‘hypocrite’

And a preposterous characature of ‘progressive’.

Had white supremacists been making similar wild assertions and expressing similar hatreds, you’d have been pumped up with rage, indignation and pompous self-righteousness.

When the pope, for instance, denounces abortion, all dance the apeshit panic, but when Khalid expresses a similar distaste for the procedure, we place finger to chin and then, cheek to cheek with other coquette leftists, weigh the relative merits of his deep, informed opinions with brevity and great nuance.

So many pom-pommed french poodles rolling their ‘arfs’.

Harrys Place – land of liberty but not a word on this. Maybe Gordon will turn up to says its all been invented by mad rightists and the Mail.” – Tory.

He may be correct if he does so. Whilst on this subject shall we remind ourselves that the police interviewed Prime Minister Tony Blair under caution at 10 Downing Street? That HRH the Princess Royal has a criminal record? I for one believe that no one should be above the Law. Do you?

In that scenario there is a hero. Let’s call it a hero-guessing test. For people like me, it’s the sergeant: for people [sorry to use the same word in this context] Chaudhari, Galloway and Tamimi I’d guess it’s the motorbyker. I wonder how many of the speakers above so beloved of these British student societies and those who invite and applaud them would pass the test.

http://www.geocities.com/project_coast/

Or maybe being Muslim isn’t the be all and end all of their identity, so they don’t see the Islamic Society as “their student society”. Maybe they don’t really give a shit about Islam or the politics attached to it and are more interested in studying and passing their assignments than in fart-arseing about with the Islamic Society.