<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time for direct action on climate change?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:11:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: field</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265654</link>
		<dc:creator>field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265654</guid>
		<description>Andrew Adams did no such thing. 

My point was not that there has been no global warming over the last ten or twenty years for that matter, it is that given the HUGE increase in carbon emissions in the last few years, this should be on a rising trend, not a weak rise, or a levelling off. 

Some of the hottest summers in Europe were around 2000/2001 (not part of the Nino effect). They have since cooled. 

I ain&#039;t being blinded by science - or stats -  on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Adams did no such thing. </p>
<p>My point was not that there has been no global warming over the last ten or twenty years for that matter, it is that given the HUGE increase in carbon emissions in the last few years, this should be on a rising trend, not a weak rise, or a levelling off. </p>
<p>Some of the hottest summers in Europe were around 2000/2001 (not part of the Nino effect). They have since cooled. </p>
<p>I ain&#8217;t being blinded by science &#8211; or stats &#8211;  on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Short order cook</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265240</link>
		<dc:creator>Short order cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265240</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess it’s your turn for a bad analogy. The underlying physical theories behind climate change are fairly simple, and certainly far simpler than the quantum mechanical studies of protein and DNA which are needed for a theoretical understanding of what causes cancer. We know that introducing CO2 and CH4 into the atmosphere will raise temperatures, we know what effect other gases and particles will have in the atmosphere. Also, we’ve known about these theories for over a hundred years, and have been developing methods for studying the climate for far longer, compared to the 50 years that we’ve known about DNA, and less that we&#039;ve been able to isolate and study proteins and DNA.

Also – “a few hundred years”! Have a think before you type! Three hundred years ago what state was science in? Newton was still alive and the Principia was less than 50, chemistry didn’t even exist yet, Darwin’s great grandfather hadn’t even been born. I’m not going to claim I know where science is going to be in a few hundred years time, but if we’re still crunching out models trying to work out the Earth’s climate, then something’s gone seriously wrong in the interim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess it’s your turn for a bad analogy. The underlying physical theories behind climate change are fairly simple, and certainly far simpler than the quantum mechanical studies of protein and DNA which are needed for a theoretical understanding of what causes cancer. We know that introducing CO2 and CH4 into the atmosphere will raise temperatures, we know what effect other gases and particles will have in the atmosphere. Also, we’ve known about these theories for over a hundred years, and have been developing methods for studying the climate for far longer, compared to the 50 years that we’ve known about DNA, and less that we&#8217;ve been able to isolate and study proteins and DNA.</p>
<p>Also – “a few hundred years”! Have a think before you type! Three hundred years ago what state was science in? Newton was still alive and the Principia was less than 50, chemistry didn’t even exist yet, Darwin’s great grandfather hadn’t even been born. I’m not going to claim I know where science is going to be in a few hundred years time, but if we’re still crunching out models trying to work out the Earth’s climate, then something’s gone seriously wrong in the interim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Meredith</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265229</link>
		<dc:creator>John Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265229</guid>
		<description>&quot;But that proves SOC’s point. There is a collective benefit in everyone paying their taxes, which means that individuals face sanctions for not complying even though their contribution on its own is insignificant.&quot;

It doesn&#039;t prove his point at all. Unless HMG can force the US, China and the rest of the world to cut CO2 emissions at gunpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But that proves SOC’s point. There is a collective benefit in everyone paying their taxes, which means that individuals face sanctions for not complying even though their contribution on its own is insignificant.&#8221;</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t prove his point at all. Unless HMG can force the US, China and the rest of the world to cut CO2 emissions at gunpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Meredith</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265220</link>
		<dc:creator>John Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265220</guid>
		<description>&quot;Gosh, I don’t know! It’s not like we’ve spent millions of pounds and decades researching it or anything.&quot;

No, we have spent millions researching climate trends. What causes those trends (if they are trends) is entirely open to question. We must have theories but we really have no way of telling which ones are right. We may, in a few hundred years, have a clearer view, but that may be far too optimistic given the complexity of the problem.

Compare with an infinitely simpler problem where we have spent much more on research and much loner in reserching and consequently have much better data that can be laboratory tested (unlike a global climate): what causes cancer. Our answer so far ... um ... something to do with genes and something to do with environment.

When someone tells you they can be more positive about the much more difficult theoretical area of climate change, make sure you have your hand on your wallet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Gosh, I don’t know! It’s not like we’ve spent millions of pounds and decades researching it or anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, we have spent millions researching climate trends. What causes those trends (if they are trends) is entirely open to question. We must have theories but we really have no way of telling which ones are right. We may, in a few hundred years, have a clearer view, but that may be far too optimistic given the complexity of the problem.</p>
<p>Compare with an infinitely simpler problem where we have spent much more on research and much loner in reserching and consequently have much better data that can be laboratory tested (unlike a global climate): what causes cancer. Our answer so far &#8230; um &#8230; something to do with genes and something to do with environment.</p>
<p>When someone tells you they can be more positive about the much more difficult theoretical area of climate change, make sure you have your hand on your wallet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward e10</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265123</link>
		<dc:creator>edward e10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265123</guid>
		<description>Oh I love this country and this forum

Do we discuss the ideas and motives of Plane Stupid or even Climate Change
No, we indulge in reverse snobbery dressed up as comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I love this country and this forum</p>
<p>Do we discuss the ideas and motives of Plane Stupid or even Climate Change<br />
No, we indulge in reverse snobbery dressed up as comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pig with lipstick</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265120</link>
		<dc:creator>Pig with lipstick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265120</guid>
		<description>The whole AGW proposition is based on false data, imperfect computer models, unconnected thinking, manipulated information, vague theories, idle speculation and emotional guff in order to create an illusion carefully maintained by pretend scientists, researchers looking for funding, political chancers, media luvvies angling for easy-to-steam-up subjects, people with strange guilt complexes about modern life, whimsical romantics who think living in the dark past is fun, various dimwits who love to fasten on to outlandish ideas and above all, governments who yearn to find new taxes to make people pay up more for less. 

Other than that, carry on boys and girls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole AGW proposition is based on false data, imperfect computer models, unconnected thinking, manipulated information, vague theories, idle speculation and emotional guff in order to create an illusion carefully maintained by pretend scientists, researchers looking for funding, political chancers, media luvvies angling for easy-to-steam-up subjects, people with strange guilt complexes about modern life, whimsical romantics who think living in the dark past is fun, various dimwits who love to fasten on to outlandish ideas and above all, governments who yearn to find new taxes to make people pay up more for less. </p>
<p>Other than that, carry on boys and girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Adams</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265114</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265114</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Take a look at the above link. One would expect the global warming line to be accelerating now as China and India have been pumping huge amounts into the atmosphere in the last ten years. But 1998 was the warmest and the last few years have not been off the scale.&lt;/i&gt;

Short Order Coook explained this @ 3:27</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Take a look at the above link. One would expect the global warming line to be accelerating now as China and India have been pumping huge amounts into the atmosphere in the last ten years. But 1998 was the warmest and the last few years have not been off the scale.</i></p>
<p>Short Order Coook explained this @ 3:27</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Adams</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265113</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265113</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There is a basic principle of the scientific method. You record and publish what you did, what you measured, and your calculations.&lt;/i&gt;

Er yeah, that&#039;s what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is a basic principle of the scientific method. You record and publish what you did, what you measured, and your calculations.</i></p>
<p>Er yeah, that&#8217;s what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: field</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265097</link>
		<dc:creator>field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265097</guid>
		<description>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/01/06/br_r_r_where_did_global_warming_go/

Take a look at the above link. One would expect the global warming line to be accelerating now as China and India have been pumping huge amounts into the atmosphere in the last ten years. But 1998 was the warmest and the last few years have not been off the scale. 

I certainly don&#039;t think that the Gospel According to Gore (who nevertheless managed keep all the lights on in his 27 bedroom mansion AND clock up more air miles than the average pilot) has been proven to be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/01/06/br_r_r_where_did_global_warming_go/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/01/06/br_r_r_where_did_global_warming_go/</a></p>
<p>Take a look at the above link. One would expect the global warming line to be accelerating now as China and India have been pumping huge amounts into the atmosphere in the last ten years. But 1998 was the warmest and the last few years have not been off the scale. </p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t think that the Gospel According to Gore (who nevertheless managed keep all the lights on in his 27 bedroom mansion AND clock up more air miles than the average pilot) has been proven to be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: field</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/comment-page-2/#comment-265096</link>
		<dc:creator>field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/12/09/time-for-direct-action-on-climate-change/#comment-265096</guid>
		<description>Smircky says: 

&quot;Not so much ‘plane stupid’ as ‘plain stupid’ &quot;

Sorry that does really count as a witty riposte does it? I mean given they are punning on plain stupid in the first place. 

How about &quot;gapocrites&quot;?  They certainly are if they&#039;ve jetted to Thailand or Peru in the last 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smircky says: </p>
<p>&#8220;Not so much ‘plane stupid’ as ‘plain stupid’ &#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry that does really count as a witty riposte does it? I mean given they are punning on plain stupid in the first place. </p>
<p>How about &#8220;gapocrites&#8221;?  They certainly are if they&#8217;ve jetted to Thailand or Peru in the last 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

