<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keith Olbermann Stands Up For Happiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ET</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-256438</link>
		<dc:creator>ET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-256438</guid>
		<description>Whatever you feel about this commentary... bad, good, indifferent... I was left with one overwhelming question: how does a man like Keith Olberman live more than 49 years without knowing at least one gay couple that is/wants to be married? How??

His circle of friends must be mighty small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you feel about this commentary&#8230; bad, good, indifferent&#8230; I was left with one overwhelming question: how does a man like Keith Olberman live more than 49 years without knowing at least one gay couple that is/wants to be married? How??</p>
<p>His circle of friends must be mighty small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David All</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-255092</link>
		<dc:creator>David All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-255092</guid>
		<description>Do not pay any attention to Morgoth. He keeps a pin up of Senator Joseph McCarthy on the inside of his clothes closet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not pay any attention to Morgoth. He keeps a pin up of Senator Joseph McCarthy on the inside of his clothes closet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senator Smoot</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-254685</link>
		<dc:creator>Senator Smoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-254685</guid>
		<description>So Olbermann can do &quot;serious&quot;.  Who&#039;da thunk it?  His points are right on, but the heavy sighs and lip-trembling were so out of character, I kept waiting for the surprise punch line.

Would it have been so hard to just say &quot;Their marriage is none of your business&quot; ?  Could it be that there&#039;s some entitlement at stake in the difference between &quot;marriage&quot; and &quot;civil union&quot;?  Just asking; I don&#039;t really know, but it almost seems that must be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Olbermann can do &#8220;serious&#8221;.  Who&#8217;da thunk it?  His points are right on, but the heavy sighs and lip-trembling were so out of character, I kept waiting for the surprise punch line.</p>
<p>Would it have been so hard to just say &#8220;Their marriage is none of your business&#8221; ?  Could it be that there&#8217;s some entitlement at stake in the difference between &#8220;marriage&#8221; and &#8220;civil union&#8221;?  Just asking; I don&#8217;t really know, but it almost seems that must be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of Hope</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-254520</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-254520</guid>
		<description>Like they say, never try to teach calculus to snails. Snails don&#039;t get it. So arguing for humility among the PsychotardChristians is generally a waste of your time. 

And for the record, the entirety of the Guardian is one big glorified blogorrific Op-Ed column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like they say, never try to teach calculus to snails. Snails don&#8217;t get it. So arguing for humility among the PsychotardChristians is generally a waste of your time. </p>
<p>And for the record, the entirety of the Guardian is one big glorified blogorrific Op-Ed column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveW</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-254487</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-254487</guid>
		<description>&quot;I agree, but the above clip is the TV equivalent of an op-ed. It isn’t a news report and doesn’t try to be&quot;

While it is in a &quot;comment slot&quot;, I don&#039;t think it is viable for one individual to have separate identities - as both propagandist and journalist. This is why the WSJ has a completely separate staff (including editors) for the news and editorial pages.

If the WSJ had a single staff, I would not trust it as a news source; as it is, by some measures the news pages lean more left than the NYT&#039;s news pages. 

Journalists should stick to journalism, and leave propaganda to editorialists. Otherwise you get &quot;campaingning journalism&quot;(sic) like the Mail or the Guardian where the editorializing begins on the front page and ends on the back cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I agree, but the above clip is the TV equivalent of an op-ed. It isn’t a news report and doesn’t try to be&#8221;</p>
<p>While it is in a &#8220;comment slot&#8221;, I don&#8217;t think it is viable for one individual to have separate identities &#8211; as both propagandist and journalist. This is why the WSJ has a completely separate staff (including editors) for the news and editorial pages.</p>
<p>If the WSJ had a single staff, I would not trust it as a news source; as it is, by some measures the news pages lean more left than the NYT&#8217;s news pages. </p>
<p>Journalists should stick to journalism, and leave propaganda to editorialists. Otherwise you get &#8220;campaingning journalism&#8221;(sic) like the Mail or the Guardian where the editorializing begins on the front page and ends on the back cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herman</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-254467</link>
		<dc:creator>Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-254467</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; However, good journalism seeks to be as objective as reasonably possible, and goes out of it’s way to seek out different perspectives. &lt;/i&gt;

I agree, but the above clip is the TV equivalent of an op-ed. It isn&#039;t a news report and doesn&#039;t try to be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> However, good journalism seeks to be as objective as reasonably possible, and goes out of it’s way to seek out different perspectives. </i></p>
<p>I agree, but the above clip is the TV equivalent of an op-ed. It isn&#8217;t a news report and doesn&#8217;t try to be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveW</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-254427</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-254427</guid>
		<description>&quot;it is something to get emotional and passionate about. More power to him.&quot;

I agree with that in general, but when a jouranist does so, he/she stops being a jouranist, and becomes a propagandist - just like Lou Dobbs and Bill Riley.

There is no such thing as truely objective journalism - any reporting carries with it some set of assumptions. However, good journalism seeks to be as objective as reasonably possible, and goes out of it&#039;s way to seek out different perspectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it is something to get emotional and passionate about. More power to him.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with that in general, but when a jouranist does so, he/she stops being a jouranist, and becomes a propagandist &#8211; just like Lou Dobbs and Bill Riley.</p>
<p>There is no such thing as truely objective journalism &#8211; any reporting carries with it some set of assumptions. However, good journalism seeks to be as objective as reasonably possible, and goes out of it&#8217;s way to seek out different perspectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boogski</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-254395</link>
		<dc:creator>Boogski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-254395</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Keith appears opposite O’Reilly and provides a competent alternative. He claims he is competitive. I haven’t seen the numbers.&lt;/i&gt;


&lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/110608oreillyolbermannweek.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Last week&#039;s ratings&lt;/a&gt;

If I&#039;m reading this chart correctly:

1. O&#039;Reilly slaughters Olbermann in &lt;b&gt;total&lt;/b&gt; viewership. However...

2. In the 25-54 age group (the one that matters to advertisers), they are practically tied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Keith appears opposite O’Reilly and provides a competent alternative. He claims he is competitive. I haven’t seen the numbers.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/110608oreillyolbermannweek.gif" rel="nofollow">Last week&#8217;s ratings</a></p>
<p>If I&#8217;m reading this chart correctly:</p>
<p>1. O&#8217;Reilly slaughters Olbermann in <b>total</b> viewership. However&#8230;</p>
<p>2. In the 25-54 age group (the one that matters to advertisers), they are practically tied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Franco</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-254322</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-254322</guid>
		<description>excellent!!! 

I loved it because it&#039;s a matter of principle.

and the man is using a passionate tone, so what? this is basically about rights, but it&#039;s not only about rights and emotions count, the defence of human dignity is both rationally and emotionally demanding, and I always am disturbed when people avoid to take a stand by saying &#039;this is not a priority, there are other more urgent problems to tackle...&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent!!! </p>
<p>I loved it because it&#8217;s a matter of principle.</p>
<p>and the man is using a passionate tone, so what? this is basically about rights, but it&#8217;s not only about rights and emotions count, the defence of human dignity is both rationally and emotionally demanding, and I always am disturbed when people avoid to take a stand by saying &#8216;this is not a priority, there are other more urgent problems to tackle&#8230;&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.B.</title>
		<link>http://hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-254276</link>
		<dc:creator>M.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/11/11/keith-olbermann-stands-up-for-happiness/#comment-254276</guid>
		<description>Keith, apparently, was one of primary movers behind Rachel Maddow getting her own hour.  Maddow is an outright sensation at 9 p.m. Eastern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, apparently, was one of primary movers behind Rachel Maddow getting her own hour.  Maddow is an outright sensation at 9 p.m. Eastern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

