The paper has been beating the drums for years for a second Holocaust in the Mideast.

It also censors pro-Israelis politically while protecting Islamophilic and anti-Semitic speech.

In sum, The Grauniad-CiF are compleat hypocrites advancing institutionalised, genocidal anti-Semitism, with no moral right whatsoever to criticise other papers.

Israel is under no obligation to recognize the Hamas. The Hamas is not an Israeli political party. Stupid commentary, Sunny.

So let me get this straight. If people from an area elected BNP councillors or a mayor, you would be against acknowledging that person?

You would basically say that its the people’s fault for electing someone from a far-right party and because of their stupidity, the media and other politicians should not acknowledge that BNP candidate.

Right?

“Withdrawing ambassadors is rather different from arming the opposition, imposing an economic blockage, assassinating politicians (as Israel has done) and refusing to even talk to the government, all of which predictably precipitated a civil war in which both Hamas and Fatah committed atrocities (it was not one sided as you continually imply), and all this after the US basically facilitated the election in the first place, as part of its global mission to bring democracy to the world.”

readers will remember that there has always been splits in Palestinian groupings between is hard line Islamists and secular nationalists, such as Fatah

and anyone following the conflict between the two will remember how neighbouring Arab states were constantly twisting arms to bring the two groupings together, see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6334981.stm

and let’s not forget how Hamas executed a cook, by handcuffing his hands and throwing him off the top of a building

so the truth is slightly different than how TheIrie would represent it

In a wide-ranging conversation with the New York Times, he [Ghannoushi] repeatedly placed primary blame for excesses committed by Islamic regimes on Western “rejectionist attitudes,” and justified the murder of Arab and Muslim intellectuals who had embraced secularism, referring to several as “the devil’s advocate…Pharoah’s witches. The educated who put their brains and their talent in the service of an oppressive regime have made their own decisions. They must bear the responsibility for their choice.”

Ghannushi has also repeatedly emphasized that Western hostility to Islam is due to the activities of Zionism, which, in order to retain aid and support, is striving to convince the West that following the collapse of communism and the failure of Arab nationalism, Islam is the new evil force in the world. Speaking in closed sessions at radical Islamic conferences, his rhetoric was even more fiery: “Zionism does not only target Arabs and Muslims. It targets goodness…the entirety of values that have crystallized in humanity. Every evil in the world, the Zionists are behind it. This is no exaggeration. There are so many evils in the world, and behind which are the Children of Israel.”

http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/1997/issue2/jv1n2a7.html

But remember people – even if Soumaya is ‘totally in agreement with her father’, it still means nothing.

The above is simply not comparable with the rhetoric of the BNP.

In fact it was only David that raised it.

I don’t believe I brought up her lineage, although Irie suggests I did. I wonder why? Could it be Irie is a liar, as well as a useless idiot?